fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agoEvidencemander.xyzimagemessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1389arrow-down126
arrow-up1363arrow-down1imageEvidencemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square89fedilink
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoMaybe there were other big bangs, but we need evidence of that, and that evidence doesn’t exist. Jyst saying “but we don’t know” isn’t a replacement for evidence.
minus-squareColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·5 months agoThere’s no evidence that time started at the big bang, either. So it’s silly to say.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 months agoNot how it works. “Time exists” is a positive statement. We need evidence for positive statements. There is no evidence of time until the big bang.
Maybe there were other big bangs, but we need evidence of that, and that evidence doesn’t exist.
Jyst saying “but we don’t know” isn’t a replacement for evidence.
There’s no evidence that time started at the big bang, either. So it’s silly to say.
Not how it works.
“Time exists” is a positive statement. We need evidence for positive statements. There is no evidence of time until the big bang.