• Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    I totally agree with a streamlined identification of images generated by an AI prompt. But, to label an image with “made with AI” metadata when the image is original, taken by a human, and simply used AI tools to edit is absolutely misleading and the language can create confusion. It is not fair to the individual who has created the original work without the use if generative AI. I simply propose revising the language to create distinction.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Where I live, is very difficult to get permits to knock down an old building and build a new one. So, builders will “renovate” by knocking down everything but a single wall and then building a new structure around it.

      I can imagine people using that to get around the “made with ai” label. I just touched it up!

      • parody@lemmings.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s like they’re ignoring the pixel I captured in the bottom left!

        Really interesting analogy.

        Also I imagine most anybody who gets a photo labeled will find a trick before making their next post. Copy the final image to a new PSD… print and scan for the less technically inclined… heh

      • Sensitivezombie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Or generated with AI like midjourney, therefore, made with AI.

        There a huge difference between the two, yet, no clear distinction when all lumped into the label of “made with AI”