• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Massive subsidies? Selling the cars at a loss? Using conflict minerals? Slave labor? All of the above?

    • schizoidman@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Conflict materials can be avoided with LFP batteries that are basically only made in China.

      • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Or buying from a company that traces source of origin for their components such as Polestar.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The automakers less so. They don’t particularly care what powers the cars people buy, so long as people buy them. They were in the process of pivoting to electric platforms, but, being as terminally stupid as they are, a lot of that has been put on hold while they try to figure out why their current $100,000 offerings aren’t selling by the millions.

      • Wooster@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Automakers care about how much R&D they have to invest and the impact on the quarterly profits. ICEs are dirt cheap in that regard, and it took the federal government bribing them to do so.

  • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Two paragraphs that don’t answer the question in the title, and a request for donations. Useless.

    • XTL
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Here’s a fixed article:

      There’s no war and US doesn’t care.

  • londos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Putting aside politics, macroeconomics and questions about build quality, one unavoidable answer is…because they want to. The US should get more ambitious.

  • Beaver@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    The west needs to turn on the heat for legacy automakers management

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Because they give zero shits about passenger safety, pedestrian safety, worker rights, customer rights, are owned by the government, and steal all their tech instead of putting in the work themselves?

    • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I thought you were talking about GM for a second. Tell us more about how US truck/SUVs are so great for pedestrian safety, the child labor at the Hyundai plant in the south, the relentless spyware and horrible data privacy practices, the US auto bailouts, and their “innovation”. I have no love for Chinese EVs, but the US domestic market has plenty of problems on their own.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        You do realize American have sensors that will you if theres a kid there, right? Just because some European urbanite who has never driven a car thinks hoods are too tall doesnt mean he knows what hes talking about.