• flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    If we don’t have the power to stop generative AI, then what makes you think we have the power the change copyright law? Generative AI uses up huge amount of power and water to the point of causing issues for national infrastructure. There is a clear climate case to be made against generative AI and unlike copyright law the public actually care about climate change.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      You cannot stop GenAI unless you stop sales of all gaming GPUs and recall all sold ones world wide. You just can’t. That cat’s out of the bag. You can try to restrict big corpos like OpenAI, but your politicians and bought already. Therefore adding your voice to trying to “stop GenAI” via copyright laws is just playing yourself. You can try to restrict GenAI via climate protections, but that will go as well as efforts to stop supporting genocides (or as well efforts have gone to protect the climate anyway).

      • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        If our politicians are already bought and sold to the point that calling for these industries to be regulated is pointless, then why would politicians listen to our calls for ‘open weights by default’.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          They won’t, of course. But they will use the pressure towards copyrights against AI to kill open source GenAI progress. But at least when advocating for Open models, you don’t hurt the people who are doing FOSS.