The former president, in a typically loud post on his social media platform Truth Social, claimed that FBI agents had been authorized to use ‘deadly force’ during the raid of his Florida property
You both seem to be talking past each other. Funny thing about it is, you are both right about your arguments and make great points. Unfortunately, you both are arguing the wrong people. Fun!
Man I just out two and two together. FlyingSquid was probably referencing how no one died in the “raid” and seathru was probably referencing how a bunch of spies and other sensitive personnel mysteriously disappeared or were killed after Trump had that meeting with Putin and then asked for….spies and sensitive personnel info shortly thereafter.
For all those who did not read or at least skim the article. FlyingSquirrel is referencing Trumps claims that the FBI was authorized to use deadly force when conducting their UnCoNsTiTuTiOnAl raid.
Hell nobody died and he still hasn’t shut the fuck up about it.
The man has never shut the fuck up about anything, ever.
Well except for his currently underway trial that he was totally going to testify in, that the defense just rested their case without him testifying in. Because his lawyers know that not only can he not shut the fuck up, he can’t make it through 3 sentences without telling at least one blatantly obvious lie, and that is a generally unadvisable thing to do when you are under oath.
And yet no one died. Weird…
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/26/us/politics/trump-affidavit-intelligence-spies.html
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/575384-cia-admits-to-losing-dozens-of-informants-around-the-world-nyt/
You sure? Could just be coincidence I guess.
You know that’s what Trump wasn’t talking about, and thus what I wasn’t talking about.
What are you talking about then? His claim they were authorized to use deadly force?
I’m probably daft and missed the joke.
ftfy
You both seem to be talking past each other. Funny thing about it is, you are both right about your arguments and make great points. Unfortunately, you both are arguing the wrong people. Fun!
?
Mine was an attempt at meta humor based on the op’s negative inference sentence structure.
Maybe they were doing an attempt at meta humor based on people talking past each other? Idk, this thread is an impressive mess.
Man I just out two and two together. FlyingSquid was probably referencing how no one died in the “raid” and seathru was probably referencing how a bunch of spies and other sensitive personnel mysteriously disappeared or were killed after Trump had that meeting with Putin and then asked for….spies and sensitive personnel info shortly thereafter.
Seriously though, which one of y’all cuts hair?
Maybe its all an attempt at meta humor and all of us are talking past one another?
They could have. We all know that the president can authorize killing his political opponents. I was told that was very cool.
For all those who did not read or at least skim the article. FlyingSquirrel is referencing Trumps claims that the FBI was authorized to use deadly force when conducting their UnCoNsTiTuTiOnAl raid.
*FlyingSquid
It’s okay. I don’t mind being a squirrel.
*FlyingSquirrel
*Flying Squid 🙃
For those of you who are confused about what FlyingSquid is talking about, Trump claims the FBI agents were authorized to use lethal force.
You don’t know that.
I absolutely do. If someone had died, Trump would never have shut the fuck up about it.
Hell nobody died and he still hasn’t shut the fuck up about it.
The man has never shut the fuck up about anything, ever.
Well except for his currently underway trial that he was totally going to testify in, that the defense just rested their case without him testifying in. Because his lawyers know that not only can he not shut the fuck up, he can’t make it through 3 sentences without telling at least one blatantly obvious lie, and that is a generally unadvisable thing to do when you are under oath.
He won in 2016 and still brings that up