• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    Continue with that analogy. What would happen if that woman had no other option. Should she choose the nice guy, the chad or object to the choice being fostered upon her and choose nobody? And if she’s paired anyway with that person, should she then act as if it was her choice, or take actions to disengage from that person and destroy the system that caused these turn of events?

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      You can tactically vote for Biden to avoid Trump and still take actions to dismantle the system.

      • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Or you could maybe take actions to fix the system. Because whatever you lot come up with after dismantling is going be worse for everybody else.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You can still do both. The only viable path to election reform comes from downballot state elections anyway.

          • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can still do both

            Not sure that I follow what you mean. You can’t fix a system that is being dismantled, so I’m guessing that you mean something else.

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Well if you properly dismantle the system, we won’t be voting this November anyway. Better get on that quick, bud.

              • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I disagree, if we are legitimately talking about dismantling the USA, like what happened to USSR, then it will take decades or more to do peacefully. Not gonna happen overnight, babe.

                • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Bro I thought we were talking about the election system, not the whole damn country. You wanna destroy the country, elect trump. I guess that’s why you encourage people not to vote for biden.

                  • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    I never said anything about destroying the country. If Texas wants to secede, let them, I say. If democrats and republicans can’t get along, then keep em separated, I say.

                    Also, I only encourage people to vote their conscience. I don’t care who they vote for.

                    If you lot are trying to talk about election reform again, then go back and listen to what Lawrence Lessig was talking about before the democrats blocked him from the debates to protect hillary.

                    edit: and don’t call me bro. use the proper “brother” or don’t bother, i’m not gender-conforming

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        So the woman in our scenario should decide to choose the “Nice Guy” tactically?

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I don’t think it does. A choice fostered upon me at the threat of violence is not a choice at all. I refuse to participate and therefore legitimize such a farce.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              5 months ago

              You’re free to do nothing, but smart people choose to minimize harm when there are only bad choices in front of them.

            • Taleya@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah nah mate. You have the right to not vote. But if you choose to exercise this right you don’t get to whinge about the person elected by those who did vote.

              Society is not composed of you and you alone. It is composed of many. You took yourself outta this decision but it’s still being made freely by everyone else and no, it doesn’t impinge on you to accept the democratic consensus of the many

              • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                But if you choose to exercise this right you don’t get to whinge about the person elected by those who did vote.

                roflmao, sorry, that is just absurd.

                until the UN General Assembly says that the right to share an opinion only applies to people who vote, you are totally wrong.

                i’ll exercise my universal right to complain and have self-determination in government by not voting for genocidal maniacs, thank you very much.

              • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I understand that I’m living in an oppressive system enforced by violence and that my life is shaped at the threat of state violence. you don’t need to reiterate that to me. It’s why I’m not legitimizing it by participating in this farce of “democracy” and instead dedicate my life to changing it.

                Whichever puppet is on top doesn’t change all that whatsoever. Nor will your platitudes about be “accepting the democratic consensus of the many” when I don’t have the alternative due to said violence.

                • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Well said. As someone who is going to vote for Biden to keep Trump out of office, I harbor no ill will towards leftists who choose to reject the whole charade. One way or another, we need to bring down the system, and I don’t see any evidence that voting for centrist democrats is likely to incrementally move us towards a better system.

                  On the contrary, it seems more likely to me that Trump would potentially accelerate the evolution of society by fucking everything up so badly that we would have no alternative but to make radical changes.

                  However, given that I am unable to be certain of the future outcome of each timeline, I believe that voting for Biden minimizes the risk of a worst case scenario. But again, I don’t approve of shaming leftists for abstaining, because the reality is that both parties are colluding to maintain the status quo, and ultimately if Trump wins the election its not the voters who will be to blame, but the Democratic party for failing to produce a credible challenger.

                  • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    For the little it will be worth to you, i am a radical moderate and we can find common ground in fixing the broke in radical ways.

            • Kashif Shah@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              A choice fostered upon me at the threat of violence is not a choice at all

              Indeed. Vote your conscience or don’t vote at all.

            • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              . A choice fostered upon me at the threat of violence is not a choice at all. I refuse to participate and therefore legitimize such a farce.

              Life is full of choice forced upon you, thats unavoidable short of choosing to stop existing. I am forced to choose between where to work. If I say “fuck it, I’m not going to legitimize this capitalist system, I’m making no such choice”, I’ve still made a choice, one that will end up with me being homeless. The threat of violence came true anyways.

              It’s in my best interest to choose, and in the meantime work to dismantle the capitalist system that is threatening me with homelessness. But when it comes to voting, it’s worse because the lives of others are on the line.

              You don’t have the luxury to stand by and do nothing when people’s lives are on the line.

              How many trans people will die as a result of suicide or outright killings as a result of Trump coming to power? Their blood will be on your hands, how much are you ok having on your hands? You have the opportunity to vote for a candidate that isn’t going to ban GAC, who isn’t going to condone or pardon violence against trans people, who isn’t going to shift the culture towards more hatred.

              And you’re choosing to stand idly by and let the harm happen.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          If the woman in the scenario is going to be stuck with the nice guy or Donald Trump, then yes she should tactically choose the guy who isn’t an unapologetic rapist. She can influence the nice guy’s behavior, and avoid the horror of Trump. She does not have to condone or accept the nice guy’s bullshit behavior, and there will be a future.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      And if she’s paired anyway with that person

      This line right here is where it should be obvious how far this “analogy” has to be twisted to even start to become analogous.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      object to the choice being fostered upon her and choose nobody?

      do you genuinely think not voting will make neither candidate win