kixik@lemmy.ml to LibreWolf @lemmy.ml · 9 个月前Firefox to collect your (anonymized) search datablog.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up167arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showprivacyguides@lemmy.onefirefox@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up166arrow-down1external-linkFirefox to collect your (anonymized) search datablog.mozilla.orgkixik@lemmy.ml to LibreWolf @lemmy.ml · 9 个月前message-square18fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.linuxuserspace.showprivacyguides@lemmy.onefirefox@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareHouseWolf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 个月前I might be a bit out of the loop but I assumed the LibreWolf team already removes questionable code when building their fork?
minus-squarelemmyreader@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 个月前Yes. My point was that by using Firefox ESR as base the update cycle would be much slower which I would welcome.
minus-squarelemmyreader@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 个月前Firefox ESR is like LTS. It would mean less work for LibreWolf maintainers and less upgrades for the users.
minus-squarekbal@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 个月前I find Firefox ESR much more relaxing to use than the version that springs new features and bugs on you randomly throughout the year.
I might be a bit out of the loop but I assumed the LibreWolf team already removes questionable code when building their fork?
Yes. My point was that by using Firefox ESR as base the update cycle would be much slower which I would welcome.
But what would be the benefit of that?
Firefox ESR is like LTS. It would mean less work for LibreWolf maintainers and less upgrades for the users.
I find Firefox ESR much more relaxing to use than the version that springs new features and bugs on you randomly throughout the year.