• ilmagico@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    6 months ago

    Google Maps, their traffic data has no rivals, unlike gmail which has plenty of good competition. It’s the one thing I couldn’t easily replace yet.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      True. I wanted to replace it with OSM or similar, but my main use of Maps after navigation is exploring places, reading reviews, and browsing pictures. They have a database that is tough to replace.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I prefer OSM since I can use the maps offline. Google maps is useless out in the middle of nowhere without any cell service.

      • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        65
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not to discourage usage of OSM at all, but you can absolutely download offline maps on mobile with Google Maps, they’ve just hidden it a bit. If you tap your account icon in the upper right, a menu pops up that includes offline maps, and it’ll let you select boundaries to download.

      • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        Far from any desire to give kudos to Google: Maps does allow offline maps.I had greater London available on my iphone recently, and that worked.

        • Rolando@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I do the same when I go on vacation. Take an old phone, no cell plan, just use the wireless at the hotel and take the phone as a map and camera. No cell plan means work can’t call me, map still works bc of GPS and bc the data is manually downloaded (under profile menu.)

      • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which makes it good for hiking, and I’ve found it’s better for bike routes too. However, I can’t easily search for places to go, there’s no recommendations, and generally you need to know the address of the place you’re going to (not just a restaurant/bar etc.).

      • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        OSM is great for everything non-commercial. Hiking path, finding a playground, public toilets or even the closest with few benches to eat a sandwich.

        But for everything commercial and car navigation google maps is unfortunately much better.

      • ilmagico@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, I also use and highly recommend OsmAnd, great for offline maps, outdoor activities and lots of stuff… but no traffic data.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I switched away from google maps to Apple Maps a few years ago and I honestly can’t tell any difference. If google maps traffic data is better, it’s not in any noticeable kind of way for regular day to day usage.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Honestly Apple Maps is better in my area by a decent margin. It’s up to date sooner and that matters in a rapidly growing city. Google still beats it in search but even then AM finds things it doesn’t at times. i just wish they’d move on from shitty Yelp. I vastly prefer AMs navigation over GM as well.

      • ilmagico@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That would require me to buy an iPhone which I won’t do for many many reasons… but ok, maybe Apple Maps is a decent competitor nowadays, good to know.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      their traffic data has no rivals

      do you mean the waze traffic data, or does google actually have some of its own?

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        6 months ago

        or does google actually have some of its own

        every phone running Google’s version of Android with location enabled.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          And just like their ridiculous chat apps, they have no beneficial feature integration or consolidation between the two.

          Google Maps has the ability to report speed traps and hazards, but none of that data comes from Waze or vice-versa.

    • auzas_1337@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I only use google maps to find bussinesses. It’s pretty awful for navigating, which is kind of what maps are made for.

      I’ll plug Mapy.cz here. I’ve been using it for about 7 years now. It has even the most obscure paths that you wouldn’t believe would be on a map (at least in Europe) and the bussiness search is alright.

      No idea if it’s based on OSM or is its own thing, but if I were to guess, it is.

    • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      How good can it be? I’ve been driving 35-40 miles to work and the same back for a year now and Apple Maps tells me what minute I’ll arrive and I usually arrive within 3-5 mins either side.