The gas industry funded the whole thing:

In today’s fight over gas, CRA also hasn’t acted on its own. It refuses to say who paid the legal bills for its Berkeley suit. As a nonprofit, it must make its tax filings public. In these forms, nonprofits are supposed to disclose contractors to whom they paid at least $100,000 in the previous year. CRA regularly lists law firms working on its behalf, such as those litigating Covid-related restrictions. But the restaurant group has never disclosed a payment to Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP, the law firm that spearheaded the Berkeley case.

The Berkeley lawsuit topped the $100,000 threshold. When Sarah Jorgensen, the law firm’s founding partner, spoke at a National Propane Gas Association board meeting in February, she was asked what a legal challenge of this sort would cost, according to a recording of the discussion heard by Bloomberg Green. After an NPGA executive estimated it would require $300,000 to $400,000 to take a case to court and “another couple of hundred thousand” for appeals, Jorgensen said “we definitely spent more than that on Berkeley.” In a written response to questions, Jorgensen declined to say who paid their legal bills.

  • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    We need to get to zero, and stoves are a key marketing point that results in the installation of gas heat and a methane-leaking distribution network which are both quite meaningful.

    Induction is also @#$@#$ amazing. Not going back to gas. Ever.

    • deegeese
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is about restaurants, not residential.