Proponents boast that 802.11bb is 100 times faster than Wi-Fi and more secure.

  • LennethAegis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Won’t light based wi-fi have problems penetrating walls? I did not see that point brought up in the article.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its sort of indirectly mentioned when they mention the security benefits of lifi, as in order to effectively have access to it, you would need access to the room.

      The tech isnt meant to completely replace wifi, it just jas some benefits in certain use cases over wifi.

    • Krapulaolut
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was brought up in the article as better security.

      “Moreover “Light’s line-of-sight propagation enhances security by preventing wall penetration, reducing jamming and eavesdropping risks, and enabling centimetre-precision indoor navigation,” says Shultz.”

      • cutitdown@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pretty cool, especially considering how it’s been shown that WiFi can be used to pretty accurately determine the position and number of people in a room with AI.

    • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article discusses this, it’s a benefit. They use the example of reusing your overhead light as a lifi broadcast. That way it’s more secure because it doesn’t penetrate through walls. You could use something like a desktop lamp be the router, not not have to worry about the signal leaving the room.

        • Pencilnoob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well it certainly can be a benefit to have super fast wireless data that doesn’t leave the room. Especially for businesses that work with huge amounts of sensitive data. Probably not as useful for home use though

          • LennethAegis@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Gotta be a big room for the that, otherwise just wire everything. Unless they want a clean aesthetic in their business, I guess.

    • beefcat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will have all the same deficiencies your eyes do. If you can’t see through a wall, then neither can “Li-Fi”.

    • Big P@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      From the article:

      Of course, Li-Fi isn’t going to sweep away Wi-Fi and 5G alternatives (nor wired networks). Radio waves still have a distinct advantage with regard to transmission through the atmosphere at great distance, and though opaque objects.

      It seems like this is technology more for 1 way communication with devices over a large completely open area like a warehouse