• phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 months ago

    You wonder how far this slide right can continue. Rather than resigning, every Republican who doesn’t like Trump, Gaetz, or MTG should hold on to their seat and try to right the ship. Otherwise, we just end up with a crazier and crazier bunch.

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think that shows Jeffries should not say the quiet thing out loud. Johnson is cooperating on stuff that is first-order essential (preventing shutdown/foreign relations) and that would normally pass the House essentially uncontested. The only reason these votes are controversial is that the GOP has turned traitor.

      The current bills are nothing like what passed in the House under the speakership of Pelosi (unfortunately most of those bills did not pass in the Senate).

  • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    “Even though we’re in the minority, we effectively have been governing as if we were in the majority because we continue to provide a majority of the votes necessary to get things done,” Jeffries said. “Those are just the facts.”

    The Republican majority in the House stands at just five seats, with all in attendance, meaning Johnson has no room for error on controversial bills to ensure passage without working with Democrats.

    Johnson also faces an ouster threat from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), who has blasted the Speaker for working with Democrats and creating a “uniparty.” Jeffries and Democrats have said they will protect Johnson against Greene’s motion to vacate.

    Jeffries has already used Democrats’ influence to pass some bipartisan priorities in the House. Congress passed a $95 billion foreign aid package last week after weeks of negotiations with hard-line Republicans who resisted the effort.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Jeffries said Sunday in a CBS “60 Minutes” interview with Norah O’Donnell that Democrats hold outright influence over the House because of how fractured the GOP majority is.

    “It’s a difficult situation on the other side of the aisle, because many of my Republican colleagues are more interested in creating chaos, dysfunction, and extremism,” he continued.

    The Republican majority in the House stands at just five seats, with all in attendance, meaning Johnson has no room for error on controversial bills to ensure passage without working with Democrats.

    “But when that mess starts to impact the ability to do the job on behalf of the American people, then the responsible thing at that moment might be for us to make clear that we will not allow the extremists to throw the Congress and the country into chaos.”

    Greene is expected to make her motion to vacate privileged this week, potentially setting up a vote.

    Unable to make a deal with his own party, Johnson voted with Democrats to advance the bill.


    The original article contains 425 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 60%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s not the flex Jeffries thinks it is to point out that a Republican majority is effectively indistinguishable from a Democratic majority.

    • Zaktor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Or at least that the Leader sees what they’re doing now as what they would do were they actually the majority. Giving Republicans votes when you have some bipartisan agreement is very different from actually being able to pass your own agenda and no one should want to imply what’s happening right now is “Democratic control”.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Giving Republicans votes when you have some bipartisan agreement is very different from actually being able to pass your own agenda and no one should want to imply what’s happening right now is “Democratic control”.

        Democrats don’t pass their own agenda when they do have control. Jeffries is right; it’s functionally the same thing.