• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    I disagree. I think it’s worth as much time as possible letting people know that they’re reading books written by a bigot to their kids.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t think most people actually care. And if it doesn’t affect the reading of the book, why should they care?

      My shelves are filled with authors that have questionable views. I own some books by Marquis de Sade and Yukio Mishima and those authors are extremely controversial. I own a copy of Being and Time and Heidegger is associated with Anti-Semitism and Nazism. Agatha Christie’s novels are filled with casual orientalism and racism, and Houellebecq is criticized for being a sexist Islamophobe whose stories have far-right extremist views. My shelves are filled with pessimists and misanthropists and I’m quite sure many of them would share Rowling’s views on transgender issues, but I have no plans to get rid of those books.

      I understand why someone no longer wants to read Rowling and essentially cancels her, but at the same time I wonder if cancelling authors is any different from banning books. Should we stop reading books because their authors were not good people or is there a difference between deceased authors and modern authors who are alive to profit from booksales? Do you separate the book from the writer or is the author’s personal life relevant to you?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Letting parents know gives them the choice and letting people know that someone is a bigot is not ‘canceling’ them.