Sopuli
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
MrMakabar@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk technology@slrpnk.netEnglish ·
edit-2
1 year ago

Generate shadows without trees: vegetable awnings, a new way to generate shadows in the city.

www.singulargreen.com

message-square
43
link
fedilink
284

Generate shadows without trees: vegetable awnings, a new way to generate shadows in the city.

www.singulargreen.com

MrMakabar@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk technology@slrpnk.netEnglish ·
edit-2
1 year ago
message-square
43
link
fedilink

I found these kind of cool as an idea, as they can be added rather easily to existing cities and provide some greenery without taking up space, while providing shade:

https://www.singulargreen.com/en/green-shades-valladolid/

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you cities didn’t cut down all the trees to put up asphalt and skyscrapers, maybe these wouldn’t be needed.

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you built dense cities, like this you massively reduce land usage of cities. It also removes the need for cars and allows for easier sharing of many other resources. This means dense cities have a much lower carbon footprint then other forms of living. London for example has per capita emissions of 3.3t. Skyscrapers are not the best solution for density, but they work and in this case thats mid density housing.

      This is a good way to have some greenery in a place, where planting a tree is difficult. This is a 6m wide street with shops on both sites, which is mainly used by pedestrians. If you plant a tree on the sites of the street, it does not get enough light. In the middle of the street it ends up blocking trucks from resupplying the shops, which is also not an option.

      • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you build dense cities, you don’t need to build car infrastructures. You rely on walk, bike and public transport. You have plenty of space for trees and green spaces everywhere.

        • MrMakabar@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is in the historic city center of Valladolid. So where can you remove car infrastructure so you can have trees everywhere? I am not talking about a park, but trees on a street to improve the micro climate and provide cooling.

          • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I grow up next to an old medieval town. I’m not a stranger to how these towns are build. There are a lot of places where you can plant trees in the streets. Of course, the streets will be narrower with the place for just the pedestrians, bikes, and emergencies services. It’s a fully car free town in this case. Your link is perfect. You have Pl. de España on the right where you could plant a small forest on it.

            You see all the terrasses. They could have trees in the middle.

            For this purpose of reducing the temperature, you have this project where they will keep a central bus stop but plant many trees to cover it.

            • MrMakabar@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That might be me having a bit of a skewd idea of what having trees everywhere means. Still too many cars though and obviously relatively new.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t cut them down

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If only we hadn’t invented agriculture, none of our current problems would exist

Solarpunk technology@slrpnk.net

technology@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@slrpnk.net

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms…

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3 users / day
  • 11 users / week
  • 321 users / month
  • 1.06K users / 6 months
  • 55 local subscribers
  • 2.94K subscribers
  • 369 Posts
  • 2.63K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
  • KeraKali@slrpnk.net
  • BOT@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org