• z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “American companies are scared of the open market when it works against them, yet refuse to make better products”

    • randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      There is a good reason why American companies are scared. It almost never works out for them. Sony vs Zenith TVs is a great example about how a foreign company improved on a technology (color tv) and made zenith look like a stingy dinosaur overnight. Instead of selling color TV’s zenith just doubled down and sold cheaper shittier TV’s. By the time color was standard, their reputation was ruined and no one wanted a Zenith when Sony was the best. Sony however wouldn’t have been able to get into the market without help from zenith in the first place.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      The issue was that Chinese EVs are ahead of Western EVs due to aggressive subsidy and investment by the Chinese government to get ahead. So the market has been distorted which is what was “scary” according to the quite in the article that spawned the headline.

      Having said that, I’m not sure I believe that Chinese EVs will be better quality. They may be cheaper and they may even have technically advanced but from experience of other Chinese products, quality is not a word I’d associate with them.

      • bitfucker@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The US government can do the same, and they do bailouts for companies often too. Isn’t that also meddling in the free market? Why didn’t the US government incentivize EV then?

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          One of the ways they have are through CAFE credits - incentives for higher fuel efficiency and electric vehicles, since at least 2012. However the credits are tradeable, so legacy manufacturers instead bought credits from Tesla, and other EV manufacturers

      • lorkano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        BYD is so ahead because they were making batteries for a long time before going into ev business. Also I would not say tesla quality is high either

      • pop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        7 months ago

        due to aggressive subsidy and investment by the Chinese government

        yes. similar to a lot of western products.

      • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        All the best and worst shit you own is made in China. If you don’t want cheap shit don’t buy cheap shit, but these cars are really nice and inexpensive.

        These cars are in tons of countries outside of China and they are very well received.

        • DjMeas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I agree with you. China is manufacturing cheap products because that’s what (a lot of) consumers want as well. They also make expensive quality products, too. I have friends who like to rag on Made In China products but they love the quality of their iPhones which are just Designed in California.

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Americans aren’t going to care about quality that much if their monthly payment is only $200. As long as a Chinese EV is reliable long enough to make it’s total cost of ownership much lower than American EVs or ICEs they will line up to buy them.

        The American market has been desperate for a cheap and reliable car, a role Japanese automakers used to fill, and both US and Japanese makers know it.

      • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        American cars have their own subsidies as well. I mean the government bailed them out of dying several years ago.

        We shouldn’t have bailed them out. We should have bought a public controlling interest in them.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t know about other countries but US has both pretty strong incentives and protectionist barriers. However they’re meant to be temporary. This is legacy automaker’s chance. A few years for the government to help them transition, but they need to be willing to come out of the closet. They’re throwing that opportunity away

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          If anything, American companies have a massive resistance to change. Change has a risk and a price, and they’re determined to stick with what works. Like the movie industry…why make brave and risky moves to make a unique movie when you can retread old ones or wring every penny out of a franchise?

          Anyway, the US auto industry has a long history of institutionalized exceptionalism, I can’t find it right now but there’s a quote from one automaker that, when confronted with a suggestion that change is needed, the response is essentially “you’ll buy what we tell you you’re going to buy”. IOW they dictate what the consumer wants and gets. And maybe they’re gambling on more protections against Chinese companies so they don’t have to change and can maintain their control. Incentives just seem to be soaked up and disappear. They jack up the prices to the consumer so there’s no real help, like Tesla raised their price to match buying incentives offered by the government to consumers. Straight up greed.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            short sighted greed. That behavior makes sense only if you’re focused on the short term and don’t care about the future of your company

            • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              7 months ago

              Time and again the quarterly report has taken precedence over the long-term wellbeing of a company. Think of the value for the shareholders.

      • RatherBeMTB@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        American Cars look like relics from the last century when compared to Chinese design and capabilities, that is why the American car companies do not want Chinese brands in their market because there is no way they can compete with them.

        Chinese brands just arrived in Mexico and it has been a massacre for american and European brands, a lot of car dealers have been closing lately and you can see in the streets that most new cars are Chinese. The Chinese dealers have impeccable service and the architecture is impressive. Prices are 1/3 of the European cars and 1/2 of the American Cars. The only ones that might be able to compete are japanese and Korean car companies.

      • z00s@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Cheap labour under a command economy is hard to beat, I’ll grant you that. But the best counter to that is to focus on high quality construction, like Toyota does, for example