(kinda) A great website to share if you have no idea how to explain the downfall of the US economy.

Edit: Thanks to everyone who provided insight on this website. I’ve had this in my bookmarks for a very long time and was curious how it held up.

  • @Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    114
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    While there is no doubt that the Nixon shock and gold standard had huge effects in 1971, that website pushes a goldbug agenda that isn’t supported by other sources.

    For example the labor productivity gap didn’t start until after 1979. Which is no surprise given that 1980 was the start of Reagan pushing his trickle down economics.

    https://www.epi.org/productivity-pay-gap/

  • @Krono@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    512 months ago

    Leftists: its deregulation and reagan and the destruction of labor unions and forever wars and wall street and the death of manufacturing and and and

    Libertarians: “GOLD!”

    • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      152 months ago

      I’m kinda tired of seeing this fucking website being passed around. Several of those rocketing charts begin their launch sequence in the 80s. Must be the gold! Regulations are bad!

      • @jkrtn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        152 months ago

        Libertarians cannot handle the cognitive load of multiple contributing factors, otherwise they wouldn’t be libertarians.

        • @orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          I had a libertarian try to explain how a corporation couldn’t be evil because fire exists, needless to say, he never got the whole part about an idea not being the same as a rock

  • @protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    432 months ago

    This site explains absolutely nothing, it just shows a bunch of graphs with limited to no correlation and no reason at all to think they have any common causality

    • @RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      02 months ago

      What take? It is just a bunch of graphs.

      This may be the first time I’ve seen anybody say that facts have a libertarian bias.

      That is not the way I read the data.

      I see the boomers hitting the labor market and people with capital getting rich off the depressed price of labor.

      • @Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        152 months ago

        It’s a common homepage linked by libertarians in an argument.

        Also: read the Hayek quote at the end. This homepage tries to sell youesomething and it an’t graphs.

      • @orrk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        ah ya, “facts”, sure many of these graphs can be based on real data, hell maybe even all of them, but then you take a step back and look at these graphes, are the fun arrows and lines at 1971 actually meaningful? or are they there to try and use the data to shape an opinion? taking advantage of the average person’s statistic illiteracy, to push some form of partisan agenda?

        such as the first graph, we have a nice little arrow and a dot with the number 90.84% but the actual diverging of the variables doesn’t start until later, when exactly? you can’t tell because the graph only labels three data points on the X axis!, and this isn’t the only deliberately misleading graph here, that the authors are using to openly lie about the data to those who aren’t well versed in this stuff.

        facts don’t have a Libertarian Bias, but Libertarians sure are prone to spreading lies.

    • @reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -12 months ago

      I’m not a libertarian, but something did go awry around that time. You can see it when you watch reruns of game shows like the price is right. Automobile prices double after a year, and then keep doubling.

  • @grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 months ago

    Something indeed happened to cause the decoupling of wages and productivity, but dropping the gold standard (like that site would have you believe) ain’t it.

  • @callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    172 months ago

    The divergence of productivity and wages coincides with a lot of things, like the rise of the service industry, and tons of deregulation and lower taxes over those decades.

  • @gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    112 months ago

    This site reads like a creepy Ayn Rand fesish tribute page:

    As mentioned previously, railroads were the first large scale industry. The railroad revolution brought with it tremendous improvements in standard of living and a fall in the cost of transportation of goods and people. However, as is the case with most revolutions of industry, the government intervened heavily with subsidy and regulation.

    Some railroads (for example The Great Northern) were indeed built in this Libertarian fashion, as purely free market enterprises which competed on the marketplace of transportation (coincidentally these were usually the few that did not go bankrupt) and productive land ownership.

    • It’s weirder than that. The website owner is sharing his paraphrasing of a book by Murray Rothbard. He is the man who coined anarcho-capitalism, protege of von Mises, a Jewish immigrant who organized a group st Columbia to show support for Strom Thurman, mocked by The National Review for his old world isolationist beliefs, called Hayek a liberal, and inspiration to Pat Buchannon, David Duke, and Ron Paul. This Baffler article from Jon Ganz does a great job of breaking down who he was and his relevance to the current Trump moment. He was a self-declared paleo-libertarian.

  • @arin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    At the end it’s the big rise in seed oil consumption… Interesting, also WTF the insane rise in health admin staff

    • @Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      72 months ago

      China is #1 and Russia is #3 in global gold production.

      Could you imagine the US being able to support Taiwan and Ukraine if China and Russia had complete control of the US monetary supply?

      • @shortwavesurfer@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -192 months ago

        The US doesn’t need to be supporting Taiwan, Ukraine. The US needs to be supporting the US. Let Taiwan and Ukraine support themselves.

        • @Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Supporting Ukraine is supporting the US.

          And even if the US wasn’t involved, China and Russia, by controlling the gold supply, would still have complete control over the US economy.

        • @orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          ok there, Mr. Chamberlain, you know what happened to every isolationist nation throughout history… right?