Amendments to anti-prostitution law also enable courts to sentence trans people to three years in prison

Iraq’s parliament has passed a bill making same-sex relations punishable by up to 15 years in prison, in a move condemned as an “attack on human rights”.

Transgender people will also be sentenced to three years in jail under the amendments to a 1988 anti-prostitution law, which were adopted during a session attended by 170 out of 329 lawmakers on Saturday.

A previous draft had proposed capital punishment for same-sex relations, in what campaigners had called a “dangerous” escalation. The new amendments enable courts to sentence people to between 10 and 15 years in prison, according to the document seen by AFP, in a country where gay and transgender people already face frequent attacks and discrimination.

They also set a minimum seven-year prison term for “promoting” same-sex relations and a sentence ranging from one to three years for men who “intentionally” act like women.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        The sad thing is a significant chunk of Lemmy seems to have either forgotten America’s role in shaping Iraq into the way it is today or aren’t aware of it at all. Satayana would be shaking his head.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Iran didn’t “guide” them into creating a constitution that was deferential to Islam. In fact, the Ba’ath party, which was gotten rid of when Saddam was defeated, was secular. It was the U.S. that did that.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Do please tell me what I’m missing. Is the person I was replying to who I was essentially agreeing with also missing the same thing?

            • otp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Your original reply seemed like you were talking about the comment, not agreeing with it

                • otp@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yeah, and the other commenter got it, but the other other one thought that that other commenter thought you were serious. But the other other commenter was wrong; that other commenter knew you were joking. And so did I.

                  Man, this is getting confusing. But everyone understood your comment, at least! Lol

                  • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Well I was wrong about someone else being wrong but I think you’re about who was wrong or right. Am I right?

      • saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Bombing isn’t really in the Iraq playbook yet.

        Maybe it can be added after the latest section on insurrection sand we’ll see about next time.