Exclusive: Study released at Cop28 misused research to underestimate impact of cutting meat eating, say academics
A flagship UN report on livestock emissions is facing calls for retraction from two key experts it cited who say that the paper “seriously distorted” their work.
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) misused their research to underestimate the potential of reduced meat intake to cut agricultural emissions, according to a letter sent to the FAO by the two academics, which the Guardian has seen.
Paul Behrens, an associate professor at Leiden University and Matthew Hayek, an assistant professor at New York University, both accuse the FAO study of systematic errors, poor framing, and highly inappropriate use of source data.
Hayek told the Guardian: “The FAO’s errors were multiple, egregious, conceptual and all had the consequence of reducing the emissions mitigation possibilities from dietary change far below what they should be. None of the mistakes had the opposite effect.”
Meanwhile some states are pushing to ban lab grown meat before it’s even become a product that can be tested as an actual product heading to market.
Yeah, but it’s the same states that are trying to ban solar panels because “muh coal!!” They slow progress, but they won’t stop it.
Yea, I’d rather we kick them in the balls so they stop slowing good things down while the world burns, but maybe I’m the only one who sees the benefits of a world without contemptable morons in charge.
Don’t you threaten them with a good time!