It seems like the FOSS community is continuing to grow, and FOSS apps keep getting better (Immich reallh blew my mind recently), which is a big win 😎 but there are still many apps I use that I would kill for an open source alternative. I am curious what you guys think? Are there any apps you’d love alternatives for?

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Discord. It’s extremely popular and has no direct alternatives (Matrix spaces thing isn’t ready at all yet)

    EDIT: I didn’t know Revolt and Zulip existed. I’m doing a research on them now

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Matrix is also extremely complicated to sign up for. I tried getting some tech savvy friends to sign up for Matrix the other day. Even for someone tech-savvy it is waaaaaaaay too complicated. Many of the clients don’t even have a sign up option, you need to sign up elsewhere first.

      • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah…for many of these programs the onboarding is so daunting, even for those who are tech savvy. Laymen don’t stand a chance with something that is that complicated. It doesn’t often seem to be a technical issue either, more-so a user experience or design problem

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          It doesn’t often seem to be a technical issue either, more-so a user experience or design problem

          Oh 100%. The problem is that there’s a lack of UX designers and such in the Open Source community. There’s technical people building stuff but they often don’t know how to make a good user experience (or in some cases they don’t care to).

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            9 months ago

            IDK why this always gets downvoted. UI/UX some of the biggest issues with FOSS software, and is a massive barrier to entry to someone who isn’t a massive computer nerd willing to put up with that shit.

            • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              I guess they take any criticism of open source as if you are against the whole movement. I don’t understand either.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              honestly i don’t even think it’s a FOSS problem, this is a problem with every UI ever made in the last three years essentially.

              Unless it’s literally making money off of you having an account, there is no incentive to design a good UI from the ground up. The solution here ironically, is simply don’t skill issue, or document it very well.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          personally when it comes to the onboarding im more on the side of “self host your own onboarding, for friends and family and shit, and then federate out from there if needed.”

          Theoretically doing a clean onboarding shouldn’t be very difficult. More involved i suppose, but if you don’t have the time to figure out how a federated instance works, (or to properly document it) you shouldn’t be on the internet, you have more pressing matters to attend to.

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are instances that are not very hard to sign up for. The main issue with Matrix is instability and performance, especially when communicating with users/groups on different instances. It’s really not a great experience. And the inability to properly delete messages can be a big deal too

      • Handles@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Many of the clients don’t even have a sign up option, you need to sign up elsewhere first.

        It’s inconvenient, sure, but think of it as an assurance that you’re not locked in with one app.

        That said, I completely agree that Matrix and Element need to work on UX, particularly making it easy for new users to adopt it as well as verification/device switching.

      • chebra@mstdn.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        @SorteKanin I’d like to see that. I have already onboarded about 35 students and my whole family to matrix, nobody had any problems with signup. Bigger problem is later if they get the infamous “Unable to decrypt message” error.

        • astro_ray@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah. I still don’t understand all the encryption stuff. I lost all my encrypted texts even after I used my recovery pass phrase on a new session.

      • Timber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Can’t relate. It’s not harder to get your hands on a matrix account in comparison to a mail account. And for those that want it even easier, just download Element and you are guided through the default registration at matrix.org

    • FrostKing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I keep hearing people recommend signal messenger as an alternative to discord, and honestly that’s the most obvious sign you don’t actually use discord

    • MultipleAnimals
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Revolt is very promising, not ready yet but already feels very similar to Discord

        • Devorlon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Doesn’t seem that bad, when you go to log in it checks your IP, length of time on the site and mouse movements.

          hCaptcha

          This section has been adapted from hCaptcha’s documentation.

          We use the hCaptcha anti-bot service (hereinafter “hCaptcha”) on our website. This service is provided by Intuition Machines, Inc., a Delaware US Corporation (“IMI”). hCaptcha is used to check whether the data entered on our website (such as on a login page or contact form) has been entered by a human or by an automated program. To do this, hCaptcha analyzes the behavior of the website or mobile app visitor based on various characteristics. This analysis starts automatically as soon as the website or mobile app visitor enters a part of the website or app with hCaptcha enabled.

          When using the Revolt App, hCaptcha will only begin analysis when you:

          Submit a login request.
          Submit a registration request.
          Submit a password reset / email resend request.
          

          For the analysis, hCaptcha evaluates various information (e.g. IP address, how long the visitor has been on the website or app, or mouse movements made by the user). The data collected during the analysis will be forwarded to IMI.

          Data processing is based on Art. 6(1)(f) of the GDPR (DSGVO): the website or mobile app operator has a legitimate interest in protecting its site from abusive automated crawling and spam. IMI acts as a “data processor” acting on behalf of its customers as defined under the GDPR, and a “service provider” for the purposes of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). For more information about hCaptcha and IMI’s privacy policy and terms of use, please visit the following links: https://hcaptcha.com/privacy/ and https://hcaptcha.com/terms.

            • Devorlon@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s the part of hCaptchas policy that’s relevant to Revolt.

              For the analysis, hCaptcha evaluates various information (e.g. IP address, how long the visitor has been on the website or app, or mouse movements made by the user). The data collected during the analysis will be forwarded to IMI.

              • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Did you miss these parts or are they inapplicable?

                How We Use Information We use the information we collect for the following purposes: To administer Integrator and Customer accounts and provide the Service. We use Personal Information in order to associate specific accounts with Integrators and Customers and to provide them the Service, to respond to requests or inquiries, to provide support or technical assistance, and to facilitate payments. To improve to Site and the Service. We use Analytics Information to improve our existing and develop new services and offerings and to customize existing and future product offerings. To derive market insights. We use Analytics Information to analyze the market and conduct business analyses related to the Site and our Services, and for other research purposes. To provide a market for Labeled Data. Our Service enables high volume data labeling and human review for machine learning systems as a service to website owners and companies who need help getting their data labeled. To that end, we disclose Labeled Data to our Customers interested in acquiring Labeled Data. To secure our services and systems. We use Analytics Information to secure our systems by identifying potential threats and vulnerabilities, and to otherwise protect the information we collect. For any legitimate business purpose, provided that the information is de-identified or aggregated such that it cannot be reasonably tied to an individual.

                How We Share Information We share or disclose personal information in the following cases: Upon direct request from an Integrator to identify the fraud risk of a specific CAPTCHA challenge request or IP address, or otherwise where specific consent was given. With vendors we engage to provide essential aspects of the Sites and the Service, such as data storage, hosting, and Analytics, and only for those purposes. As necessary to comply with applicable law, including governmental requests, law enforcement requests, and otherwise to public and private entities in order to protect the rights, privacy, safety, or property of you, us, or others. With others for any legitimate business purpose, provided the information is de-identifiedor aggregated such that it cannot be reasonably tied to an individual.

                Disclosure Regarding “Sales” of Personal Information under the CCPA. In the preceding twelve months, IMI has not “sold” any Personal Information (as defined by the CCPA), nor does IMI have actual knowledge of any “sale” of Personal Information of minors under 16 years of age (so they do sell information of people over 16). Disclosure Regarding “Sharing” for “Cross-Context Behavioral Advertising” under the CCPA. In the preceding twelve months, IMI has not “shared” any Personal Information for “cross-context behavioral advertising” (as such terms are defined in the CCPA), nor does IMI have actual knowledge of any “sharing” of Personal Information of minors under 16 years of age for “cross-context behavioral advertising”.

                • Devorlon@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I based my assumptions on the parts in Revolts privacy policy, since reading the privacy policy of hCatpcha it alludes that each ‘vendor’ can select how much data they’d like to collect I assumed that Revolt only allowed them to collect IP, length of time on site and mouse movements. While they do sell information, they claim it to be anonymised and I contacted support to see how they did that for IP addresses.

                  Which is why I don’t really mind. The information they have of me is at most how my cursor moved, how long I took to Submit a login request, Submit a registration request, Submit a password reset / email resend request and an obfuscated IP. Seems OK to me.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Honestly i never enjoyed discord It is messy and difficult to find information once its a few days old

      Id much rather use a decent forum really

      • Techognito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is more of a hammer as a screwdriver problem, where everyone decided to use chat software as a forum.

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          almost every hobby has moved to facebook and it’s the same damn thing. utterly useless for the purpose people try to use it for.

          i don’t know what the fuck is wrong with people, but this is definitely one of the pinnacles.

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            They want to use a single account for everything and have the most people possible.

            That is it really. They don’t want to have to make 50 new accounts where every account has to deal with getting past the spam policies and filters only to find that their potential base is 1/10 of that on other platforms

            That’s why reddit became the de-facto forum for many things also. 1 interface, 1 account, people can trace your account across different “forums” and it was searchable (on search engines, not shit reddit search).

            • sibachian@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              There are currently a wave of people moving certain activities to Band of all fucking things (using it side by side with facebook due to facebook policies). It’s basically a shitty korean clone of facebook but slower and with less stability and even less features.

              They could have picked ANY of the platforms actually designed for the intended purpose. But Band? It’s the OPPOSITE of useful.

              People don’t make sense.

    • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Especially with the upcoming implementation of ads. Really sucks that many communities and software support (who should have just had forums) are deeply embedded into it and will have to start from scratch and lose any and all helpful content. Its hard to see big communities moving to anything else anytime soon, even of there was a great Foss alternative. It would indeed be amazing to have one in the first place

      • brrt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think what’s even worse than ads is many channels now require verification through a phone number if you want to write something. Not sure when that became a thing but I just recently ran into this roadblock and noped tf out.

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            Adoption is always the main issue, as we can see here on the Fediverse. It’s crazy how even technically-inclined people flock to discord. So many 3d printing communities are on there, people who install custom debian distros on raspberry pis, solder wires, crimp connectors and assemble open source machines, still fall into the trap.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I recently ran into that very issue, leading to me downloading (one foss) third party clients for discord which are privacy focused. As long as discord is still the place to be I have to be there too, but I can certainly limit the data they can gather about me. I found

      • goofcord for desktop (supports plugins too)
      • aliucord for android

      Perhaps they are an option for you too

    • vort3@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you’re talking about voice channels specifically, then there is Mumble.

      If you’re talking about chat rooms, old school solution is IRC and we have XMPP that works fine for most people.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Mumble needs a server, iirc

        Edit to be more precise, it needs you to host a server of your own

          • Akasazh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            … Ok I’ll let you have that ‘technical correct’ smug satisfaction, you bastard.

            • vort3@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              But for real, if you can’t / don’t want to host your own server, just use any server from hundreds of available servers.

              • Akasazh@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Oh I’s been a while. My clan hosted our own mumble server, back in the day. Didn’t know there was a lot of public ones nowadays…

                • vort3@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  There are even services that give you free temporary servers. I don’t know why anyone would use that instead of just finding any server and use a free room if you just want to talk with friends, but well, it exists.

                  You go to a service like that, press a button, it generates you some random port number and password, then you connect to that server with mumble and become an admin of it. The server is temporary and gets automatically destroyed after some fixed period (usually something like 24 hours).

                  Also what I tried to do with my friends is run Yggdrasil and connect directly via IPv6 (so I run Yggdrasil and launch a mumble server, and all my friends enter my IPv6 address) and that works too, so no need to have public IPs or domain names to use Mumble anymore.

                  Yggdrasil is such a cool thing, loving it.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          yeah, host one. It’s not expensive. Certainly cheaper than paying for discord nitro (which you don’t have to do if you want shitty audio/video streaming quality and no emojus features)

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        No I meant an app that looks similar and contains most of the features (servers specifically) so it’s easier for not tech savvy users to get into. Someone suggested Revolt but its privacy (as in sending the data to not privacy respecting third parties) is questionable so idk if I can consider it a good enough alternative

        • astro_ray@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          There is a project, but it’s really early in it’s development. It’s called Cabal. Has a nice desktop client, looks kinda like Discord. It’s p2p, so no server required. BUT AGAIN, VERY EARLY IN DEVELOPMENT.

          https://github.com/cabal-club

          Not something you should use, but look out for how the development is going.

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            There seem to be quite a few projects. It’s slowing the development down. It would be better if everyone focused on one. But peer to peer is interesting. I’m wondering how much disk space it will use a day if I’m in a group with like 100k people though

  • Handles@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    9 months ago

    Plain banking apps for smartphones. Having those developed in the open would hopefully make it possible to have forks that work on rooted devices without hiding magisk and whatnot.

    • xlash123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      9 months ago

      That would be awesome. I wish banks would also have standardized (or at least open) APIs so I could use FOSS financial software to pull my live purchase history and then categorize that and etc. I think some banks do this, but not very common in the US from what I can tell.

      • Handles@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, if banks had open and standardised APIs we could all use the same FLOSS banking app — or choose from any of a bazillion FLOSS apps. Instead they’re going the authoritarian route and locking customers in with bloated black box, proprietary apps…

    • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had to leave VirginMoney because the lady on the phone told me I needed an iPhone to reset my password (seriously) even after trying with three separate Android devices.

      There’s no desktop functionality (mobile is king with them) and it amazed me that day I had to use the Current Account Switcher to go to an equally meh banking service.

      Sorry state of affairs across all mobile apps to be honest and as seen by the prevalence of MDM and accessing data Vs doing the very same, on a desktop “PC”. Why the data is more precious on a mobile device to them is telling…

  • prashanthvsdvn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    FOSS CAD softwares. I know FreeCAD exists but it’s very unintuitive compared to the proprietary ones. I am thankful that it exists but it’s a long way apart to become a household name like Blender.

    I wish I could start writing one but I don’t have a clear picture of requirements to plan and start writing one. If anyone is expert in this field please link some research papers and guidelines for someone to start fresh.

  • Affidavit@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Spotify.

    An open source music streaming service where I can financially support artists but where I’m not forced to put up with annoying advertisements (even when paying membership fees!), and which allows me to use whatever app I want to play the music I listen to. It is annoying AF that I need to switch between apps to listen to music because Spotify’s shitty native app is inferior in every possible way with the single exception of offering more content.

    • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      There seems like a lot of potential for an app like this with the mixture of decentralization/encryption/verification/blockchain/etc. Easily verify artists, get the artists paid with a determined currency or by merch and donations, have it federated or decentralized so artists have more control and a company can’t take percentages… I don’t know. There has to be something there. It seems possible and almost a necessity in the future for artists to make money and corporations to not enshittify each app that is released. For example, spotify adding features to try to be like TikTok, or recently they were trying to add “educational courses” to the app

      • DichotoDeezNutz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        How does that fix the shuffling? I thought it was just a UI tweak.

        I hate Spotify’s shuffling so I’m all ears

        • Techognito@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          There is a plugin called shuffle+ (github)

          I think no one likes the default shuffle in spotify. (“oh here is a list of 400 songs on shuffle, you probably only want to replay these 30 songs” - spotify)

    • GlenTheFrog@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      For desktop there’s ncspot, which is a Spotify TUI client written in Rust. Not exactly what you were asking for, but it does work well

    • Niquarl@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Reminds me how librivox and others publish their audiobooks as podcasts. I guess artists could upload their albums like this?

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      there’s this really cool alternative to streaming, called you buy their shit directly. Or if you like me, don’t really care, just finding a way to throw money at them, in their general direction sometimes works. Spotify actually works so little, that the only party that makes money, is the music publishers that spotify allows on their platform, the artists and spotify generally don’t make much money, or make very little money. Gotta love capitalism.

      If you’re a music artist, please allow people to just give you money directly, in some way. It’ll incentivize people who don’t pay for it to send you a few dollary doos.

      • Affidavit@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        there’s this really cool alternative to streaming, called you buy their shit directly.

        Wow, mind blown! I had no idea money could be used to buy things directly! /s

        Seriously though, buying music from artists you already know is easy for artists that actually provide this as an option, but it doesn’t help when trying to find new artists and songs to listen to. Spotify is brilliant for discovering new content and can’t be replaced by ‘buying shit directly’.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          i suppose that’s fair, but it’s not like spotify is the only service that has music on it. Personally i’ve been enjoying nabbing music that other people use in media that i consume, or just bumping across something that seems interesting on the net somewhere.

          I’ve gone from liking like two albums from a certain band, to liking their entire discography, just because i’ve downloaded it. You can absolutely still find music, it just requires some effort, and it’s well placed effort i think.

  • jpeps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    8 months ago

    Ultimate Guitar Tabs. After spending years getting a community to contribute to one of the best music resources on the web, they turn around and lock all but the most basic features behind a pay wall.

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Photoshop.

    And yeah, no, please, don’t come over and mention Gimp and Kryta and all the others. I get it, they’re cool for the stuff they do. They just aren’t the all in one package that Photoshop is or have as powerful tools specifically for photo editing. Photoshop would require a Blender-style major effort to replicate and Gimp just isn’t up to it. I wish it were. Photoshop is at the perfect intersection of being uniquely capable and walled off behind the single crappiest ecosystem in software.

    Nobody likes Adobe, nobody wants to work with Adobe. Nobody can avoid Photoshop. That’s just the world we live in and I don’t like it.

    • Handles@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      9 months ago

      Well, counterpoint: Photoshop tries to be an “everything for everybody” app, and GIMP/Krita don’t need to compare to that, as little as any user needs all the features of Photoshop.

      Nobody can avoid Photoshop

      Call me nobody, then. I worked with the Adobe suite professionally for 15+ years, haven’t touched it for the past six. You won’t find a single 1:1 replacement. It’s just a matter of quitting and accepting the individual limits of different alternatives.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’s a groupthink issue anyways. 3DSmax/Maya was the same for a long time, and “everyone” was saying Blender is not an alternative. And then some big companies switched to Blender and suddenly people stopped complaining about it. And while Blender did improve during that time, it did not improve so substantially that it really made all the difference.

        • Handles@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s absolutely that, like the office admin workers who swear by Microsoft Office over open alternatives no matter how insidious Windows becomes. “I know this one tool and you will have to wring it from my cold dead hands”…

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        this pretty much. Everytime i see people bitching about editors and editing, it’s almost always keybinds. Which is literally a skill issue. Or something will be organized slightly differently, also a skill issue. Or it’s feature set will be like, marginally different.

        It’s almost never something that’s going to stop you from doing what you wanted originally. Your visions change, your tools change, your ways adapt, it’s how the world works, it’s how we work. It’s how everything has always been.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I agree that it depends on your use case. If you’re an artist or illustrator you can make do with a number of alternatives and just go elsewhere for photo editing, and if you’re just doing basic adjustments to photos rather than detailed edits you can figure it out as well.

        Photohop is harder to bypass if you’re a jack-of-all-trades user mostly doing image editing but also dabbling in the other options from time to time. That’s not to say you can’t do it if you try, but it’s going to be less convenient and add friction to your workflow.

        • Handles@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, Jack-of-all-trades here as well. For sure it’s less convenient to have to switch programs for different purposes but there is also the added convenience of not having to find pirated and cracked Adobe warez.

        • Handles@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not much, honestly. Fortunately I was never very reliant on vector graphics.

          Inkscape IMO never really matured to a working solution, certainly not comparable to Illustrator, but I know others have better experiences.

    • vsis@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nobody likes Adobe, nobody wants to work with Adobe. Nobody can avoid Photoshop. That’s just the world we live in and I don’t like it.

      This sounds like Stockholm syndrome. You are just too familiar with Photoshop, so using anything else is hard and less efficient.

      In photography there is this mantra about “the most important part is right behind the camera”. A good photographer is not a good Nikon user, or good Canon user. A good photographer can deliver decent pictures with a potato camera if needed.

      Sure, a potato camera is less efficient for any work that an actual good one. So it’s good to invest in a good brand. But the point is: if you are not capable to make average results with a potato software, the problem is not in the software.

      • Miss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You know why the person themselves is the important part of this equation?

        Because they know what tools to use for which purpose.
        For example, GIMP is only now getting non-destructive editing through adjustment layers, which is such an indispensable feature for important projects

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          For example, GIMP is only now getting non-destructive editing through adjustment layers, which is such an indispensable feature for important projects

          it’s not like you could ever just copy layers or something. That’s never been a feature in gimp, not once.

          I understand your point, but to act like that is the sole thing stopping people from using, is kinda silly. (idk maybe i’m wrong and adjustment layers are this incredible feature, with never before discovered productivity benefits or something, i’m assuming not though)

          • Miss Brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            They make things so much easier, having to make copies of every layer every time just to keep the original in case you need to re-do something half an hour later is super annoying.

            Especially if you do multiple different things with a layer. Do you really have the patience to make backuo copies of a layer after every little edit you apply to it?

            And then let’s say step 2 of 5 didn’t turn out like you want. Backup copies or not, you still have to re-do everything from 2 to 5 because of GIMPs destructive nature as of right now

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              oh so it’s basically like a COW fs but for graphics editing? That’s pretty slick. I’m sure you could implement something fairly similar to that natively, though it would be a decent bit of work.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Exactly… easily replaceable but you have an endless whining of users that imagine they might somehow in the future need this one feature that office has but alternatives don’t.

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That’s an increasingly small number, if only because now Google is in that market, too.

          However, there is a second reason you need Office, and that’s compatibility. I don’t use Office for work normally, but I still have an Office account (which, annoyingly, is how you pay for Office now), because I have clients who want to work on their formats and it doesn’t make sense for me to work around compatibility and have an argument about it instead of just paying for the damn thing and working with whatever software other people want to work.

          But if I was by myself and didn’t need to work with anyone else ever? Yeah, I would not miss much from Office, honestly.

          • TCB13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            But if I was by myself and didn’t need to work with anyone else ever? Yeah, I would not miss much from Office, honestly.

            That’s my position as well. But there are certain features that I do require for work and other integrations with other MS products that you can’t get elsewhere.

            As you said if one lives in a bubble and doesn’t to collaborate with others then native Linux apps might work and might even deliver a decent workflow. Once collaboration with Windows/Mac users is required then it’s game over – the “alternatives” aren’t just up to it.

            Windows/Office licenses are “cheap” and things work out of the box. Software runs fine, all vendors support whatever you’re trying to do and you’re productive from day zero. Sure, there are annoyances from time to time, but for most people they’re way fewer and simpler to deal with than the hoops you’ve to go through to get a minimal and viable/productive FOSS-only experience. It all comes down to a question of how much time (days? months?) you want to spend fixing things and dealing with small compatibility issues that simply work out of the box under MS for a minimal fee. For most people paying for MS and doing their job right away delivers a better ROI than going FOSS and then doing their job while dealing with the small details.

            • MudMan@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              I object to that “work out of the box” comment. I have lost more work hours to OneDrive being terrible than to any single other technical reason. Office has at least as many quirks and inefficiencies as any of its alternatives.

              It’s a bit of a standard and it doesn’t… not… work? So yeah, it’s the go-to you have to have as a fallback for things to not get annoying when you work with multiple other people outside your same organization on something. Alternatives are as good or better, though, especially if you consider commercial ones as well as FOSS ones.

              But yeah, it’s priced just so that it makes sense to pay for it and not use it over not having it ready to go when you need it. On purpose. Which sucks.

              Windows is a different story. Quirky and annoying yes, but not more so than the alternatives and definitely the standard for big chunks of things in ways that it’s not trivial to replace.

              • taladar@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                9 months ago

                Teams is also the meeting system furthest from “just works” in my experience. Not sure where all the Microsoft apologists get those ideas that stuff made by Microsoft “just works”.

              • TCB13@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                But yeah, it’s priced just so that it makes sense to pay for it and not use it over not having it ready to go when you need it. On purpose. Which sucks.

                Yes, marketing. Microsoft is good at it.

                • MudMan@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I don’t even know if I give them that. I guess pricing things just at the edge of you begrudgingly buying them instead of going elsewhere is “marketing” if you squint. I mean, by all accounts they’re worse at branding than Apple and worse at PR than literally everybody else in their competing markets. After a certain critical mass it probably doesn’t matter much, I suppose. At least not short term.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      idk honestly i just don’t think i really believe this take.

      The only really objective aspect of it is going to be user complacency. It’s possible you’ve been using PS for 10-20 years now. And switching seems like an impossibility. But honestly, given the feature set, or the non existing feature set, i don’t think it really matters.

      Ultimately you can still do graphics editing in GIMP, and you can still do graphics editing in PS, it’s more about your adaptability and flexibility, rather than skill set, and software. I’ve used both photoshop, gimp, and photopea. They all do the same thing, photopea is worse than either. GIMP is more featured, and doesn’t come with adobe, PS has AI editing, and probably like 2 other features, and also the copyrighted color pack that you have to pay ransom for.

      They all work fine, stop complaining, you’ll live. Maybe that’s just the doomerism peaking through or something, but honestly, it’s such a vapid complaint IMO.

    • anon5621@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also would be nice to have open source ecosystem with blender ,then open source pro level video editing like da vinci and open source photoshop.

      • metaStatic@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m happy to give Black Magic Design my money.

        I literally wouldn’t piss on Adobe if it was on fire.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I haven’t gone back to Blender’s built in editor and postprocessing suite. I hear they did some stuff to it in 4.0.

        Still, yeah, I end up going to DaVinci because Blender editing is more like Gimp Photoshopping than it is like Blender 3D modelling and rendering.

    • ClearCutCoconut@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It does seem like a hopeless situation sometimes. I used to be a graphic designer and honestly it is very difficult to switch to any other program that is cohesive. Especially with the addition of AI features in Photoshop (keyword, I know, but generative fill can be extremely helpful in some cases). The Affinity suite is barely even able to keep up, and they have employees that are paid. Cross-compatibility and file type standards are a massive issue too, let alone the functionality itself

  • zarenki@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Stylus/handwriting oriented note taking. Stuff like Samsung Notes or Goodnotes (or OneNote, though it does a lot more) in the Android space, or e-ink options like Remarkable’s stock software.

    If I just want to use a keyboard for everything I have great FOSS options like Joplin and Standard Notes, but when I want to use a pen instead it feels like no other freedom-respecting option seem to even remotely approach the usability of just sticking with real ink and moleskine-like paper notebooks.

    Even someone willing to pay an upfront fee for proprietary apps will struggle to find good options that allow syncing and reading (let alone editing) your notes on other devices/platforms without resorting to a monthly subscription.

  • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 months ago

    An alternative to iTunes so that I don’t need a Windows VM to backup my company iPhone. But I know it’s never gonna happen because Apple is the devil.

    • RayJW@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just so you know, libimobiledevice can backup iPhones with their idevicebackup utility. It’s CLI only, so maybe not as easy to get into as iTunes but it has worked pretty well for years on my end.

        • RayJW@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s fair enough! I can tell you it’s not that difficult but having a nice iDevice suite desktop application would certainly be a big improvement!

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          honestly terminal isn’t that complicated, if you’re surviving using a VM at the moment, you could probably manage to comprehend a terminal for long enough to figure out how that software works (and as a benefit, also figure out how basically every other CLI application works)

          • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thanks for the advice, but, for now, I can’t picture myself managing a professional phone backup without a GUI.

            Had it been just a tinkering phone maybe, but not my professional one😇

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              honestly it’s no different than using a GUI, unless your place of work mandates a specific piece of software or something. It’s not like you can’t fuck shit up, but you can also do that with GUI apps too. I’ve fucked up more shit using a GUI than using CLI. That could change some day, but that’s what backups are for.

  • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Full on Transit app that works well. Most that do are closed sourced and the ones that are open do not work well. A traffic app would be good but that would be very resource intensive. So not holding my breath.