stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 8 months agoconsider the implications for a post scarcity futureslrpnk.netimagemessage-square393fedilinkarrow-up11.71Karrow-down171cross-posted to: aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.64Karrow-down1imageconsider the implications for a post scarcity futureslrpnk.netstabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 8 months agomessage-square393fedilinkcross-posted to: aboringdystopia@lemmy.world
minus-squareMagnetar@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoThose still have to be connected to the grid. be maintained, cooled, controlled, all of which costs money.
minus-squarelightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoOkay? So does the entire rest of the grid.
minus-squareblindsight@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoThe point is that those have a cost, so grid has to pay for them, essentially. Hence negative electricity prices.
Those still have to be connected to the grid. be maintained, cooled, controlled, all of which costs money.
Okay? So does the entire rest of the grid.
The point is that those have a cost, so grid has to pay for them, essentially. Hence negative electricity prices.