We should think about the advertising model before its too late and it gets shoved onto us. I think each community should get its own advertiser and they get a stick post on each post which is limited to 300 chars and one url.

Its simple, non intrusive and we can make it a bidding. 80 % of the proceeds should go to the maintenance of the instance, 20 % should go to the moderators of the instance.

Would warner brothers want this for 100 $ on movies ? I think so …

  • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think about 95% of ad campaigns are no more effective than just listing the product and the price. Maybe 5% are creative or well targeted enough to actually influence some purchases.

    Problem is the people in a position to evaluate effective advertising are mostly the same group that gets paid by to create advertising. There’s no one running around to businesses trying to sell them on the idea that advertisements aren’t all that effective and they could just save their money on much simpler communications. Plus we indoctrinate hoards of ‘marketing’ graduates into the cult of advertising every year. There’s a critical mass of people that just uncritically embrace the idea that modern advertising is the only way to sell a product, and many of their careers depend on that remaining a widely accepted idea.

    • Hamartiogonic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t these people ever study the effectiveness of different types of advertising? In physics, chemistry and biology you need evidence to support a belief. Otherwise, it’s just a questionable hypothesis.

      • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think they probably do study the effectiveness to a degree, but there’s no structure or incentive for peer review in marketing research. So their methods are likely tuned to find whatever they think will convince their clients to spend more on advertising.

        If they find a simple $1000 newspaper ad is just as effective as a a $100K television ad, they can just say “Our research has found that $100K TV ads are effective.”

        • Hamartiogonic
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          But businesses don’t have an infinite supply of money, now do they? Making smart business decisions means spending as little as possible and getting as much as possible in return. It’s in the best interests of the business owner to spend money on efficient advertising instead of wasteful advertising.

          • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely. But most businesses don’t have the wherewithal to hire impartial analysts and statisticians to evaluate the effectiveness of their ad buys. They have to rely on a combination of intuition, customer feedback, but mostly on outside advertising professionals, and those professionals have every incentive to maintain the impression that spending more on advertising it the best decision.

            • Hamartiogonic
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You are absolutely right. There’s clearly a conflict of interest. I also have a feeling that companies buying advertising services don’t really know what they’re buying, what they’re supposed to get, what they could be getting in the best case scenario etc.