• teawrecks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s PR. Anti-capitalist sentiments score well in focus groups.

      • teawrecks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        lol the difference of course being that Phil Spencer is not living on the income of a standup comedian.

      • teawrecks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        As long as the policy changes lead to even more profits, then sure.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        A controlled anticapitalist discourse. This is no different than that Pepsi ad with the “protesters” sharing a Pepsi with the police.

      • teawrecks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Time will tell. I mean, he’s not wrong. I think it’s pretty clear that studios have to make profitable games at the cost of interesting games. But it’s not like msft or anyone else is going to change their behavior. They have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders to profit as much as possible.