• LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Not sure what you mean. Bible stories are second-hand at best, and mostly 5th hand or worse.

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’m not pretending. I have no idea what you mean.

              Let’s begin again, and I’ll give you every benefit of the doubt, assuming I’m a complete idiot and that you’re making your point in earnest: what point am I missing?

              Honestly, I feel like we’re talking past each other, and I’d rather have an earnest conversation.

              • spiderwort@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                9 months ago

                I said “Maybe secondhand stories are a bad way to understand it.”

                The “it” refers to this thing called “god”. Referred to by a story that you read. A second-etc-hand story

                Assume that somebody saw something really strange. They tell their friends about it but, because it is strange, they have to make up a name and describe it via metaphor.

                Any understanding conveyed must be crippled. Because language is limited that way. Do that a few more times and we’re worse than lost. We have arrived at fanfiction.

                This is obvious.

                A better way to understand it is to see for yourself.

                • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Okay, thanks, that gives me a bit more to work with, but I’m still quite confused.

                  Your original reply to my personal story was:

                  Maybe secondhand stories are a bad way to understand it.

                  And I’m confused because mine was a first-hand story.

                  I get the ‘it’ is ‘god’. I never saw anything strange. My point was my pain was used when I was a toddler by priests to justify the stories of saints, especially their pain and sacrifice. How exactly is that a second-hand story? How is that something that can be dismissed as metaphor? How does that relate to language? It’s a direct, literal and personal experience in the Christian church. Full stop. You don’t have to like it, but it’s a real thing that happened. And no matter how it hurts your feelings, I am not alone.

                  This is not fan fiction. It’s real. I don’t care if you believe it. I honestly couldn’t care less about your beliefs in general. I’m just sharing my experiences because it helps me to talk about it. Your opinions about me don’t matter to me at all. I’m only engaging with you because I feel bad when people believe the lies told by the church, and I care about other people. If you’re going to be a dick about it and dig in your heels, I’ll stop being interested in talking to you.

                  I’m sorry you seem to feel that way, and you should probably stop trying to engage atheists until you can open your mind a bit.

                  • spiderwort@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    15
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    I did not refer to your “personal story” as fiction. I referred to your “story of god” as fiction.

                    But you know this.

                    Again with the game.