• Kromonos@fapsi.be
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    I don’t see any problems with it at this point. After all, the development of an app also costs time and effort. And if you consider that it is just for the early access and not the finished product, there is nothing wrong with it.

    • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Honestly yeah, if this type of paid early access helps fund their development, I can’t really fault them.

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      There’s one small problem I see here, though. They are restricting their beta testers to an automatically less-diverse group of people meaning that they’re not getting full possible feedback.

      That being said, their project, their rules and I support whatever they want to do with their code.

        • ttmrichter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          So in your mind “free and open source” means every two-bit developer brain fart made before a release also needs to be free and open source?

          I’m at the point of discovering why software at large tends to be such utter shite.