I can’t believe I have to defend reddit for once.

  • MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Why are we mad about an active tech company protecting their IP?

    Patent trolls buy up more patents than any company could ever be able to use in actual products in order to make money sueing everyone under the sun or striking extortionate licensing deals.

    Nokia Oyj is the part of Nokia that Microsoft didn’t buy, and it is a telecom company that does its own RnD to this day, and is perfectly open to doing reasonable licensing deals. How tf does this make them a patent troll, unless this is over something dumb and frivolous, which we don’t know yet?

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 months ago

      We don’t even know what the suit is about, so I don’t know how anyone can pick a side about anything.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’ll be ready to flip the second it comes out if this suit is BS.

        But I’m initially siding with Nokia Oyj here because they have a decent track record of actually doing the legwork on their tech, advancing the science, and sharing that with the industry through sane licensing.

        Also the company is one of the success stories of my country, so maybe I’m biased, but then that hasn’t stopped me from hating exploitative pieces of shit like Rovio and Supercell.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m just going to wait until I hear the details of the suit. At this point I don’t really understand the point of picking a side when we have almost no information.

          • MentalEdge
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Fair enough. And I’m absolutely far more interested in convincing people to just not jump to “patent troll” with this little to go on.

            And preferably not spreading misinfo like “nokia is just a microsoft puppet” when this is about the part of the company that MS never even acquired.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That’s not even close to the full story, and partly straight up incorrect.

        They sold their mobile branch. The brand of which eventually ended up with HMD global, which now makes Nokia branded phones.

        Nokia Oyj is a telecom RnD and infrastructure company, as in the hardware and standards behind wireless communication tech. They never stopped.

        They essentially pulled an IBM and exited the consumer market, but they never ceased operation, or sold off their main business.

        Microsoft has had absolutely nothing to do with Nokia Oyj since buying their consumer handset branch off them.

        • JohnEdwa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 months ago

          And even back when Microsoft bought the mobile phone operations the company making the phones was Microsoft Mobile and Microsoft only leased the brand name from Nokia to use on their mobile phones for 10 years - same as with HMD Global today.

      • Bezier@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        That is entirely incorrect. Microsoft doesn’t own the company and never did. MS bought the phone division and a license for the name to go with it.

        I tried to look up what this notice is actually about, but there’s nothing out there yet. So can’t say much being a patent troll “arm” either.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        And reddit is a husk of a former tech company who doesn’t even have a good excuse for why they’ve gotten consistently worse over the last decade.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          They’re not really a husk, they’re doing all the things they ever did. And a lot more… Which we really wish they hadn’t

          Reddit is more like a twisted/undead version of a tech company… It’s still moving and growing, it just has been taken over by the lust to corrupt the living and drain their sanity

        • MentalEdge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          And inaccurate. MS never bought Nokia in its entirety, the parts it did acquire languished for a while, with the brand eventually ending up with HMD Global. That is the company that makes Nokia phones today, and they’re doing ok.

          The company that’s relevant in this patent dispute is Nokia Oyj, the main operations of which is telecom RnD and infrastructure, and it has nothing to do with MS aside from being the company that they bought a mobile phone division from.