When I say “fake fireplace”, I mean something like those structures fueled by fossil methane that produce flame and heat but obviously don’t burn actual wood

  • deegeese
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Even if your home is powered by nuclear energy, you still don’t have uranium fuel rods in your fireplace.

    • JoshuaSlowpoke777@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      True, but I was specifically talking about nuclear fusion, which would entail helium/hydrogen plasma rather than fissionable material.

      • deegeese
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Do you expect to keep million degree hot plasma in your fireplace?

        • Thavron@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It’d heat up the room, though. And the next couple of rooms. Or houses.

        • JoshuaSlowpoke777@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          No, that still probably wouldn’t work out, as the other comments have pointed out. Just clarifying that the dangerous aspects of what I asked wouldn’t involve uranium in particular.