I don’t understand why Google didn’t just made Android closed source. They would’ve made custom roms impossible and therefore more able to control and spy on it’s users. Why did Google made Android open source, while Microsoft’s Windows is still closed source to this day?

  • Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kernel is irrelevant. By the way, MacOS kernel is open source and is derived from one of BSDs.

    • Yubishi@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      MacOS is derived from Darwin but heavily modified and now closed source. While GPL is copy left, BSD has no such requirement so you can effectively make your derivative OS closed source, which NeXT and subsequently Apple did.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, Darwin got closed, but it was open for a very long time. Yet MacOS remained closed and proprietary. Again - kernel and its licence doesn’t matter.