- 18 Posts
- 42 Comments
I asked a simple question in good faith and the response started with my account being an 8 month old bot account. The poster is not defending their list in good faith, they attack posts that question them, then block you.
I’ll say, the sensitivity surrounding this is beyond reproach. I asked how one of the line items related specifically to the “Digital Age” and you immediately responded with negativity. What an odd response.
This is most certainly not “literally” an alt account. There is no need to constantly post. So congratulations on that mischaracterization.
What does #4 have to do with the digital age?
It is, but, hopefully, over time it will get better!
2·1 年前Good luck, hoping you enjoy it!
Personally, it does get good once you enter the fantasy world. This is soon after the “tutorial” snowball fight.
If you are referring to DG, then I feel this sentiment is misplaced. He interviewed first hand accounts with the evidence necessary to take the message to the forefront. Also, if Sen. Rubio, and Sen. Gillibrand are to be believed they confirmed that witnesses feel threatened for their lives, in some cases. Armed with this knowledge we can only guess why these first hand accounts would prefer a 3rd party intermediary providing the ammunition to the public. The only hope we can have is that in private these reports are being given to Congress, which, again, based of the senators appears to be the case.
Foul, fixed.
Ha, thanks for that. Fixed.
The very same. Yep.
The night after the UAP Hearing I was discussing with people about the possible connection between the craft discussed in the hearing and this very event. Truely marvelous seeing such a connection.
3·1 年前This reads like an angry child bent on making sure no one studies this topic. The fact that a skeptic investigator is filling am ethics complaints on the disclosure act is telling that they don’t want any truth except one that keeps the phenomenon squarely in the Hocus-Pocus domain.
I understand, though having Graves and Fravor actually testify beings to light, in an official capacity, everything they have been saying in podcasts and blogs. When put under oath, congress has much more incentive, if not prerogative, to go after other pilots that the DoD has shielded from providing any information. This could drive new leads the phenomenon has needed: a program insider (though not directly), and pilots on record.
Date: 26 July Time: TBD Likely channel to watch: C-Span Participants: TBD/To be released
This is a serious change in tone and the narrative coming from one of the major news papers.
I will say, I would watch a show with these characters.
This is a worthwhile rant. I believe as the masses divest themselves of centralized services the types of dialogue that take place on the fediverse will even out. Currently how the federated world stands is similar to the early days of reddit, which was a home for the tech crowd.
They mimic the apple application format to some degree and it is a great way to distribute. The real detriment is sandboxing but with more support this could be included.