• sin_free_for_00_days
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Even for me that’s a bit. Let’s say the median household has two income earners, so base it on that. If you’re solo you can get yourself some sweet studio or whatever. So, basing the minimum income on two incomes and median rent would make minimum wage $25. That is right on the money! Nice. That’s what I’ve seen several reports say minimum wage should be if it kept up with inflation over the decades.

    Median rent for my area just to the south is $3,586.

    https://www.zillow.com/rental-manager/market-trends/orange-ca/

    We are always told/taught not to spend over 30-40% of our income on housing. Hard to do if minimum doesn’t keep up.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Can we fucking not?

      I’m so goddamn sick of society REQUIRING 2 incomes… Even your flippant disregard for single people. I’m not a desirable person for one reason or another, I’m perpetually single and I’m fucking sick of having to bounce from basement apartment to garage apartment, paying someone else’s mortgage, because I can’t afford homes on a single income…

      How about we readjust how we define economic health based on one income. Why should 2 people be required for 1 “normal” life?

      • sin_free_for_00_days
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m OK with that too, but you know all the sayings. How do you eat an elephant? How do you start a 1,000 km journey? And so on. We are so far from a healthy work/life balance at the moment that I have trouble imagining what one would look at. I apologize profusely for not taking my dreams that much further. Sorry to offend. I guess after being a single parent for a couple of decades and barely scratching by the entire time while making significantly more than minimum wage has beaten down my idealism a bit.