return2ozma@lemmy.worldcake to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agoForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1382arrow-down115cross-posted to: climate@slrpnk.net
arrow-up1367arrow-down1external-linkForcing workers back to the office could be terrible for the environmentwww.motherjones.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.worldcake to News@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square56fedilinkcross-posted to: climate@slrpnk.net
minus-squareZaktorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoYeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com be.
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoIf the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.
Yeah, but the CEO personally profits from RTO, while the company profits from reducing their office footprint. Easy choice. He’s not loyal to the company and neither should @CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com be.
If the company is publically traded, shareholders could sue over that conflict of interest.