• 𓅂𓄿@c.im
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      @JohnDClay @turkishdelight Zenz repurposes the pro-life argument that reduced birth rates are genocide to make it look like Xinjiang getting free healthcare & women who had 3 kids already receiving tubal ligations/ etc. is genocide the same way KKK guys think modernity is white genocide. China literally trained these people to be bilingual realtors and stuff like that, it wasn’t even a mega trade program or something. They got people to white collar shit Xinjiang is rich

        • 𓅂𓄿@c.im
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          @conditional_soup If you’ve heard of the one child policy here’s a fun fact none of you “China watchers” know. Most regions and/or minority groups did not get affected. If you were Han or anything in Tibet, or a minority any placd, you could be fruitful and multiply. Just an example of how China deliberately gives minority groups boosted democratic representation, healthcare access, training, and cultural representation. Which is what responsible nations should do (glaring at indian res)

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Reading comprehension really is a struggle sometimes. They specifically mentioned scale in their comment. Also, I kinda feel like being open about genocide doesn’t make it better.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          They also compared Japanese U.S. internment camps during WWII to the current suppression of Uyghurs in China so maybe take what they say with a grain of salt.