• MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The first book has barely any of the weird stuff. It’s a slow burn and by far my favorite. Did you read the full trilogy? The second book is where the plot goes off the deep end, and the third is bonkers.

    I could get into specifics but I’d have too look up chapters and sentences to quote, charachter names etc.

    And as I said, the exploration of actual sci-fi concepts is solid right up to the end.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The first tome left the strongest impression on me as well. Although I remember in some detail the whole part in space with the solar system collapsing into 2 dimensions, and that’s near the end. Some of these ideas were crazy cool. Thanks for letting me know about the not so neat stuff

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Oh I agree, if you only look at the sci-fi stuff, the books get into tons of shit that is cool as hell.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, but that was a few years ago. The scifi may have occluded the weird stuff, I guess. I wasn’t so observant of the representation of women either back then, so it may totally have flown over my head

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s fairly on the nose, if you zoom out a bit and look at the plot at arms length.

        You might remember that after the female lead character hibernates into the future. She’s wondering where all the men are, until someone explains that men have become “feminized” to the point that they are as “frail” and “beautiful” as women. The reason given is the prolonged period of prosperity making “real” men unneeded and unattractive, which is fucking stupid.

        The plot makes a point out of claiming that women lack the “ugly” parts of man making them the better half of humanity, but at the same time that those same parts are what are needed to be a pivotal person who can maintain an interstellar stalemate to save the human species.

        It’s basically three books worth of words that on gender boil down to men being doers and women being lookers, and that whenever either tries to step out of their role, things go wrong.

        Men only being valued for what they can do, and women only being valued for how they look, is classic sexism.