Rep. Adam B. Schiff’s clever and cynical ploy in California’s Senate primary enabled him to avoid risk in the November runoff. But he subjected himself to another risk.

Schiff’s TV ads ostensibly attacked Garvey for being a two-time Trump voter who could swing the Senate to GOP control. The ads also falsely implied that Republican Garvey — not Democrat Porter — was Schiff’s principal primary opponent. That disingenuous message was aimed at Democrats.

But the TV spots’ No. 1 goal was to promote Garvey’s conservative bona fides among Republican voters. Garvey couldn’t afford to promote himself. He didn’t spend a dime on TV. So, Schiff did it for him…

Ironically, Schiff made his congressional bones fighting to preserve and advance American democracy — including investigating alleged Russian interference in Trump’s 2016 presidential election and Trump’s attempt to overturn President Biden’s 2020 victory.

But in this primary election, Schiff undercut democratic ideals.

  • sin_free_for_00_days
    22·
    10 months ago

    Schiff probably would have won anyway. I would have been fine with Schiff, Porter, or Lee. I figured they were all decent. Now I think 2 of them are.

    • lettruthout@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      41·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, that tactic by Schiff really lowered my esteem for him. In a race that hardly mentioned climate change, I was hoping Porter would come in second so maybe they’d talk about that crisis. But Schiff will easily trounce Garvey, we’ll get just another Dem politician beholding to corporate interests, and the climate can will be kicked further down the road. How sad.