Trump’s legal team also tried to throw cold water on the idea in a filing earlier this week, writing that the “events of January 6 were not an ‘insurrection’ as they did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow or resist the U.S. government.”

Trump disagrees, apparently.

“They kept saying about what I said right after the insurrection,” he said outside Mar-a-Lago after arguments concluded in Washington, D.C. “I think it was an insurrection caused by Nancy Pelosi.

  • Zaktor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    His personal lawyers already made a shit case in front of the Supreme Court, but luckily he’s got at least four Justices also working the case.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I feel like thered be a case one could argue for having the justices who directly owe their jobs to Trump to recuse themselves from these proceedings… but we all know that won’t happen.

      • Zaktor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Clarence Thomas, who’s wife was literally supporting the insurrection didn’t recuse himself from the trial to disqualify Trump for that insurrection. That’s not something that really needs a case made for it. We all know they’re not going to do the ethical thing. They don’t have to.