• pimento64
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    My RX580 is about to be seven years old, and I still haven’t encountered any game that is 1) too intense for it and 2) actually worth playing, considering usually only AAA games are resource-intensive and 99% of them are MTX trash

          • Norgur@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I didn’t say it was bad. Just that you’re not missing anything if you don’t play it. Where do I say it’s really bad?

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 months ago

            Nah, but it isn’t that good either. It’s very much mediocre and would have to be as revolutionary as Bethesda claimed it would be to justify the ridiculous hardware requirements.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Everything it does other games do better.

            Space travel and exploration (space and ground, seemlessly), as well as space combat? Elite: Dangerous.

            Story? Literally anything.

            Combat? Damn near any shooter made in the last 20 years.

            Dungeon looting? Just play Fallout 4, which has plenty of issues but none as bad as Starfield.

            It’s not bad. It’s just not good at anything. I have no reason to play it over so many other games. It feels like it doesn’t know what it’s supposed to be, so it doesn’t do anything well or interesting.

            • clifftiger@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              It feels like it doesn’t know what it’s supposed to be, so it doesn’t do anything well or interesting.

              I haven’t played Starfield. But that was pretty much what I felt playing No Man’s Sky.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                In my opinion, having played both at launch, it’s a pretty similar experience, except I could see what NMS wanted to be. It wanted to be an exploration game. It just didn’t have any systems to make that interesting.

                Starfield doesn’t want to be an exploration game I don’t think, but it does have things to explore but it never makes it interesting or necessary. It’s sci-fi, but that genre is supposed to be used as a lense to look at real-world issues, and it doesn’t critique anything except maybe saying pirates are bad. None of the companions are interesting enough to care about, and they’re almost all identical, so it isn’t about them. The looting gameplay is pretty bad where you just do the same five dungeons over and over, so that obviously wasn’t a priority. I just can’t think of a single thing it actually makes important to the experience, so I don’t know what it’s trying to be.

      • tuoret
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        I upgraded my PC for that, so yeah just be glad you weren’t that stupid. Oh well, at least baldurs gate looks shiny now.

    • RampageDon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Similar situation. Still running my 980, and the only games it can’t run are some of the AAA titles. Not even because they are too intense but my card is only supported up to like VidX and they are now on Vid11 or 12.