• @cmder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    507 months ago

    French here. It is all about the IT sovereignty (souveraineté numérique). The idea is to use French solutions in order to limit leaks if confidential information and dealing with other country without worrying about threat of limiting, stopping critical services. Also it is easier to apply EU laws like GPDR. That is why all the French private company dealing with sensitive information (military, cyber security…) are only using French solutions.

    • @XpeeN
      link
      English
      107 months ago

      I get it, but I just don’t get why wouldn’t they just follow other govs’ steps and just set up a matrix server instead. It’s already available and proven.

            • @Telodzrum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              How is this a bad deal for the public? Tax dollars go directly to the local market and the only people who have to change their behavior are those voluntarily seeking employment in the government.

              It’s a complete win.

              • @Natanael@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                37 months ago

                Because sometimes that only results in worse features with more overhead. Not everything is interchangeable with the press of one button.

                  • @Natanael@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    17 months ago

                    You have no idea how complex it is to develop E2EE software. At least they could go with self hosted Matrix (in fact they already do in some departments!). Matrix is even designed to be extensible!

              • @interceder270@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                17 months ago

                Because they could be paying more money for a worse product or service.

                It’s not beneficial to take a worse deal just because you’re making domestic people richer instead of foreign ones.

      • @eliasp@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        That’s actually what they’re doing. They built their own messenger based on Matrix.

    • @Gutless2615@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -237 months ago

      Yeah I mean you’re not exactly shedding some deep insight here, it’s very obviously that. While there’s merit to banning WhatsApp, it’s just foolish to ban signal. It’s the best in class for a reason, and it’s open source. France should devote resources to auditing and supporting signal if they really want to throw money to developing secure software.

      • @cmder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        117 months ago

        You say it is obvious but yet you still talking about using Signal.

        The logic is simple, is it French ? Yes, ok we can use it if it is secure. No, we won’t use it.

        I am not endorsing this logic, this is just the logic the politician are using. So no, financing Signal won’t be a solution here.

        And of course what is the simplest way to spy your citizens, control the main way of communication.

      • Nima
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        Why is it that signal users are so… obsessive? it’s just an encrypted messaging app. Not the second coming of christ.