• PrivateNoob
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 months ago

    A wise choice tbh. Phones are already become fast enough to be enjoyable several years ago.

    • King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      i pay 1k to browse instagram so I dont care about its perfomance

      • weew@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        surprisingly this is how people defend the new pixel 8 pro.

        $999 for mid-range performance? “Well I don’t play games anyway so it’s fine”

        • King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Nice let them gaslight themselves I need those suckers to keep competition alive

        • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          How is any of that untrue? The pixels do a lot of things that no other phones do, why should the average phone user care about peak performance?

          • weew@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            because it costs $999.

            it only does what a <$500 phone can do, the the only reason pixels can “do what no other phones do” is not capability but artificial restrictions.