• AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    9 months ago

    Interestingly, the states rights debate is true, wholly.

    The north wanted to keep the right to acknowledge escaped slaves as free, and the south kept sending people up there to kidnap free men and women. They were even known to kidnap free born black people and sell them into slavery.

    The south also wanted to charge the north for this “service”.

    When people talk about states rights, remind them that the south was heavily infringing on the rights of the northern states.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        9 months ago

        States joining the Confederacy were required to enshrine slavery in their constitutions. They didn’t have the right to reject it. If it had anything to do with states rights at all, it was about ensuring the states didn’t have the right to abolish slavery.

      • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I guess you’re one of those people who are incapable of reading between the lines.

        Or maybe you didn’t read my comment at all?

        • Liz@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Eh, sorry, it seemed like you were genuinely convinced that most people were concerned about legal issues. I’ve met people who tried to make earnest arguments like that.

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 months ago

      They also put it in their constitution that slavery could never be outlawed. Sounds like a really big issue for states rights