• jabathekek
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    What is the benefit of publishing in the first place? Why not upload to arXiv and not bother with the journals? Wait. It has to do with grants, doesn’t it?

    • anandamide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, a preprint will never look as good to grant panels as a paper in Nature. But also, a preprint hasn’t been peer reviewed, and that is an important step in the process. Both could be overcome to produce a less predatory system, but it would need a radical overhaul of process and, quite frankly, scientists’ sentiment.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arxiv isn’t peer-reviewed and doesn’t count as a publication. If all you want to do is get your work out there, you’re free to do it, but it’s highly unlikely anyone will see it.

      As a researcher, your greatest hope is to learn something, tell other people about it, and have them build on it. That’s not going to happen if your paper hasn’t gone through peer review. It’s also not going to count as a publication as far as your career is concerned, and that bit does have to do with your professional standing, which counts from everything from career advancement to, yes, grants.