• MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    No he’s suggesting the game would be so shit that buzzwords were the only way it could get any runway.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      My point, albeit overly obtuse, was that the game is blockchain. He didn’t patch on the idea just to get funding.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would say, being even more pedantic, that the game uses a blockchain (which is just a different type of database) to record in game digital asset ownership. This game could have been made with a normal db taking that roll and would probably run no differently.

        He is mentioning and using a blockchain over a normal db for no other reason that it probably helped to secure funding in 2017 as it was a massive tech buzzword at the time.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It could, sure, but I’m positive the only reason he’s making it is because of blockchain. I seriously doubt Pete was rolling around a game idea for online real estate separately and just threw blockchain in as a way to get funding.

      • MentalEdge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        This game in particular, yes, but Molyneux certainly could make non-blockchain games.