What a glorious day

  • moonsnotreal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I’m more than willing to pay for apps, but I hate spyware. I wish instead of ads there was just like a $5-10 price, or a subscription of like $2 a month or something along those lines. (Idk what the actual cost to develop the app is, I’m just spitballing prices)

      • Dzso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you hate ads, but you also don’t want to pay a subscription, then what you’re really saying is “fuck developers”.

        • ciko22i3
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fuck developers who implement subscription services

            • ciko22i3
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’d rather pay 100 bucks for something and own it for life than pay 0.99 a month and lose it when their servers go down

      • moonsnotreal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok that’s a little better than I thought it was. However it is still proprietary, so you just have to trust the dev collection is turned off.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are the advertising libraries completely removed from the paid version, or is it just about not placing ads on the UI?

        • ArmoredUrethra@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The ad library is only used when it is calling for ads. The paid version doesn’t call that library, so it isn’t present at all. The developer addresses this on another post.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I haven’t yet looked into the lemmy client, but they don’t necessarily have to call any function in that library for it to be active.

            On one hand, there are the class variables in Java. When a class variable (a static one) has a value assigned at the place where the variable is declared, and the assignment is the result of a function call, afaik that will run when the class is loaded, which is basically every time the app is run. Same with static blocks.

            On the other hand, on Android an app can have components that are automatically run in certain conditions, and which can be added by any programming library you have added to your project.
            One such type of component is the BroadcastReceiver. These are mostly run on certain events broadcasted inside the app or through the whole system, but now I don’t find whether any of those that Boost reddit uses are started by systemwide broadcasts. The other is the ContentProvider. These are started every time the app’s process starts, but otherwise unconditionally. It’s common for ad and tracking code to misuse this kind of components for being active as much as possible. Looking at the Boost reddit app, along others it has the following:

            • com.applovin.sdk.AppLovinInitProvider
            • com.google.android.gms.ads.MobileAdsInitProvider
            • com.google.firebase.provider.FirebaseInitProvider (I think if you disable this one, the app won’t even work anymore, like with most other apps. Not like if disabling components would worth much, as this is not a privacy feature but a technical one, and the apps themselves can manage this)