• Zaktor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Tokenizing and calculating vectors or whatever is not the same thing as distributing copies of said work.

    It very much is. You can’t just run a cipher on a copyrighted work and say “it’s not the same, so I didn’t copy it”. Tokenization is reversible to the original text. And “distributing” is separate from violating copyright. It’s not distriburight, it’s copyright. Copying a work without authorization for private use is still violating copyright.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can’t just run a cipher on a copyrighted work and say “it’s not the same, so I didn’t copy it”.

      Yes I can. I can download a Web page, encrypt it on my machine, and I’m not distributing said work.

      And “distributing” is separate from violating copyright. It’s not distriburight, it’s copyright. Copying a work without authorization for private use is still violating copyright.

      That’s just false.

      • Zaktor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You absolutely do not know what you’re talking about. This is just trivial copyright law, but there’s a weird internet mythology that if you can access something on the net you can take it as long as you don’t share it further. The reason the mass-sharers tended to get prosecuted is because they were easier and more valuable targets, not because the people they were sharing it with weren’t also breaking the law.