I start: the most important thing is not the desktop, it’s the package manager.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I wouldn’t use ZFS. Too risky. If a new kernel comes along and ZFS fails to build or something, my system will be unbootable.

      Btrfs scratches my copy-on-write/checksum/integrated RAID itch well enough anyway.

      • supert@lemmy.sdfeu.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nix and ubuntu have in kernel support. Void’s module build system also prevents this situation. I use nix and void, so have never faced this problem.

      • dmrzl@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        In contrast to btrfs it doesn’t break your data. Everyone learns the hard way not to use btrfs…

      • supert@lemmy.sdfeu.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I gave up on btrfs when Icouldn’t recover from a full disk situation (years ago, may be better nwo). But zfs tooling is so good, reliable and intuitive, I’d not want to switch anyway.