• nimpnin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Surely, as in most modern games, the creators exact wishes is that nobody will be able to play it in a few years

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well yes of course, we can’t have the poor’s playing games years after their made!! That loses us shareholder quarterly value!! They must buy a new game yearly. Thats why we make everything online only so we can shut servers down at will, are you new in this industry?

      Thats why we are going after emulation next. Can you imagine, poor’s with access to millions of games 20-30 years old, with no subscription fees? The horror!!!

      • nimpnin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Stupidest comment of the week

          • nimpnin
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            What else should I say when you use “weird” as a counterargument? That’s not rational, replying with a rational point doesn’t make sense.

            • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              You didn’t make a coherent argument in the first place… What am I supposed to counter, exactly?

              • nimpnin
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Dude log off already, others are having zero trouble getting what I meant