swordinferno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agoHot Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up1169arrow-down11
arrow-up1168arrow-down1imageHot Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneswordinferno@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square18fedilink
minus-squarecalabast@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up19·10 months agoI agree that the person you’re replying to didn’t actually refute OOPs claim, but…uhh…I think A=B does mean that B=A
minus-squareHolzkohlen@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9·10 months agoIt should say A=>B and B=>A of course.
minus-squareHot Saucerman@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-210 months agoI guess I should have included an /s I wasn’t trying to refute anything as much as I was shitposting
minus-squaremashbooq@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up8·10 months agoI expect you meant that A => B doesn’t imply B => A
minus-squareuriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-210 months agoThe commutative property of equality is established. You might be thinking of conditionality. Given: If A then B, and B is TRUE we cannot say for certain A is true Lisa doesn’t get dessert if she doesn’t eat her vegetables. Lisa didn’t get dessert Can we asctertain if Lisa ate her vegetables?
A=B does not mean B=A
I agree that the person you’re replying to didn’t actually refute OOPs claim, but…uhh…I think A=B does mean that B=A
It should say A=>B and B=>A of course.
I guess I should have included an /s
I wasn’t trying to refute anything as much as I was shitposting
I expect you meant that A => B doesn’t imply B => A
The commutative property of equality is established. You might be thinking of conditionality.
Given:
If A then B, and
B is TRUE
we cannot say for certain A is true
Lisa doesn’t get dessert if she doesn’t eat her vegetables.
Lisa didn’t get dessert
Can we asctertain if Lisa ate her vegetables?