A shroom community was removed from lemmy.world as it was considered “illegal” content by the admins. The logic behind this is boggling, to say the least.

Marijuana is considered an illegal substance in some states in the US and is still federally illegal. /c/trees should be banned, correct?

Clown pictures of Putin are absolutely considered illegal in Russia, so that should require and immediate ban.

Freedom of speech can also be considered illegal in some places.

Incest is considered illegal so that should automatically trigger a ban on all incest porn, real or not. Hell, porn is universally taboo, so that shouldn’t have any place on this instance, I guess.

You see where I am going with this? Rule 1 is a catch-all and needs clarification. Simply saying something is illegal is not quite enough. Owning and sharing pictures of shrooms is not illegal. Trading spores or mycelium is generally not illegal either.

This is not about me being salty (which I am) about the community being removed and forced to relocate. It’s the odd bias that was applied to justify its removal.

Please note that I said fix Rule 1, not remove it. There are some really bad things on the internet that shouldn’t use lemmy as a safe haven.

  • tissek
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    Gonna be that guy. But just because something is legal in one place doesn’t mean it is legal where the instance/owner is located. And the owner is protecting their own skin, I would do the same. Can also be realted to the host.

    So as others have mentioned, it’s better to find an instance welcoming this kind of content.

    • wahming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      OP’s point stands. If that’s the case, be specific about it. Have a rule saying no drugs. Otherwise rule 1 is just a vague excuse to ban anything and everything

      • madcaesar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is a fair take. If world can’t legally host this stuff say so.

        Now if it won’t do so, because the owner of world is some Puritan, then that also needs to be disclosed so I can immediately stop my donations to the sever.

    • remotelove@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That is why I am asking for clarification around rule 1. I am sure many people would be glad to comply and start communities on other instances because of local laws and such.

      It’s an extremely vague rule, is what my point is.

      • tissek
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I agree that it would make sense to be more clear. But how clear? List of all things that are illegal? Just those things thay differ from “normal” laws? But then what are we to set as “normal”?

        Think the best would be to state where the instance is located and what national and international laws governing it. For example “No illegal content on instace based on German and EU laws”.

    • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes. I don’t see why this community cannot move to an instance hosted in a jurisdiction where this is legal.