With the month long heat wave.

    • @DerKriegs@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Thanks for the solid source! I do understand the need for keeping the discussion real, but the article clearly states,

      …concluded that to avert catastrophic health impacts and prevent millions of climate change-related deaths…

      Sounds pretty existential to me, at a scale we have never experienced.

      • @Thorny_Thicket
        link
        411 months ago

        Sure. I’m in no way against fighting the climate change and under no illusion that it’s not going to affect the lives of billions of people and will lead to probably tens of millions of unecessary deaths. It’s a true crisis.

        I just personally get irritated when people talk about it as if an asteroid is heading towards earth and is going to wipe out us all. It’s unproductive and causes extreme anxiety to many (especially young) people who don’t know better and it’s also free ammunition for climate change deniers to point out how “the libs lie about this too” etc.

        • @DerKriegs@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          That anxiety bit is too true, it has me fairly despondent when I think about it too long. It’s fair assertion you make, for sure.

    • @TheMage@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      -611 months ago

      Exactly - it is your duty to question the Government and the scientists that work for them. Lets be honest, the Govt’s track record for truth is a tad suspect and thats being extra nice. As I said earlier, the alarmists have been selling this to us(or trying to) in differently wrapped packages now for several decades. Even back in the 1970’s there were hysterical claims being made. None of it came anywhere close to being true. So, logically, people question it.

      More importantly, people question the mitigation tactics which seem to only affect the lower/middle classes directly. Another tough thing for the average Joe to swallow.