Victory for France-backed ‘Buy European’ approach to defence spending

Archive: https://archive.is/2025.03.19-115656/https://www.ft.com/content/eb9e0ddc-8606-46f5-8758-a1b8beae14f1

The planned fund for capitals to spend on weapons would only be open to EU defence companies and those from third countries that have signed defence agreements with the bloc, officials said on Wednesday.

It would also exclude any advanced weapons systems upon which a third country had “design authority” — restrictions on its construction or use of particular components — or control over its eventual use, the officials added.

That would exclude the US Patriot air and missile defence platform, which is manufactured by defence contractor RTX, and other US weapons systems where Washington has restrictions on where they can be used.

The policy is a victory for France and other countries that have demanded a “Buy European” approach to the continent’s defence investment push, amid fears over the long-term dependability of the US as a defence partner and supplier sparked by President Donald Trump.

At least 65 per cent of the cost of the products would need to be spent in the EU, Norway and Ukraine.

EU member states would not be able to spend the money on products “where there can be a control on the use or the destination of that weapon . . . It would be a real problem if equipment acquired by countries cannot be used because a third country would object,” one of the officials said.

  • miskOPEnglish
    12·
    8 hours ago

    Switzerland is targeted because of this:

    states would not be able to spend the money on products “where there can be a control on the use or the destination of that weapon . . . It would be a real problem if equipment acquired by countries cannot be used because a third country would object,” one of the officials said.

    Which is perfectly reasonable. Switzerland can sit on a throne of flawless ethics but it’s just pointless to source weapons from there.

    • Airowird@lemm.eeEnglish
      12·
      8 hours ago

      Remember at the start of this war Germany could not send the artillery shells (and maybe tanks? Don’t recall exactly) it wanted to Ukraine because they were being made in Switzerland.

      This is the logical consequence of the Swiss neutrality position.

        • Airowird@lemm.eeEnglish
          3·
          7 hours ago

          Thanks!

          It’s even worse, it’s FLAK ammo, not even something potentially used as offense like artillery.

          • einkorn@feddit.orgEnglish
            2·
            7 hours ago

            Do not underestimate the effect of 1100 rpm of 35 mm shells vs infantry and lightly armored vehicles. The gun can be lowered to -10 Degrees and AFAIK the Gepards in Ukraine have been used in a ground combat role.

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      51·
      7 hours ago

      Yep. (Of course it’s the far right in our country preaching about “neutrality” because they are in the pockets of imperialist russia).