• Korhaka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 hours ago

    These settings can be good, but are often overdone. See bloom in the late 2000s/early 2010s.

    • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Yeah, chromatic aberration when done properly is great for emulating certain cameras and art styles. Bloom is designed to make things look even brighter and it’s great if you don’t go nuts with it. Lens flares are mid but can also be used for some camera stuff. Motion blur is generally not great but that’s mainly because almost every implementation of it for games is bad.

    • gamer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      I always hated bloom, probably because it was overused. As a light touch it can work, but that is rarely how devs used it.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        It’s usually better in modern games. In the 2005-2015 era it was often extremely overdone, actually often reducing the perceived dynamic range instead of increasing it IMO.

    • ixlthyxl@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Also the ubiquitous “realistic” brown filter a la Far Cry 2 and GTA IV. Which was often combined with excessive bloom to absolutely destroy the player’s eyes.