• Korhaka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    It would depend on the country. In the UK even drawn depictions are illegal. I assume it has to at least be realistic and stick figures don’t count.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It sounds like a very iffy thing to police. Since drawn stuff doesn’t have actual age, how do you determine it? Looks? Wouldn’t be great.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I mean that’s the same thing with AI generated content. It’s all trained on a wide range of real people, how do you know what’s generated isn’t depicting an underage person, which is why laws like this are really dangerous.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          Exactly. Any time there’s subjectivity, it’s ripe for abuse.

          The law should punish:

          • creating images of actual underage people
          • creating images of actual non-consenting people of legal age
          • knowingly distributing one of the above

          Each of those has a clearly identifiable victim. Creating a new work of a fictitious person doesn’t have any clearly identifiable victim.

          Don’t make laws to make prosecution easier, make laws to protect actual people from becoming victims or at least punish those who victimize others.

      • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Imagine having to argue to a jury that a wolf-human hybrid with bright neon fur is underage because it isn’t similar enough to a wolf for dog years to apply.