• Zaktor
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You can see who didn’t read the article by their responses. Of course since this is the third major disaster in national news that had the same narrative, it’s getting harder to believe it’s a mistake.

    These are one-time payments for immediate needs, not total compensation and support after the disaster. The same thing happened after the Maui fires. The federal government gave them immediate money to do stuff like buy new clothes, get baby supplies, and eat out in the immediate aftermath of losing their home, but there were other programs to provide housing and ongoing support while things are rebuilt.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      To be fair, the article doesn’t really mention anything about the various sources of total compensation to victims, and does repeat “one-time payment” four times. Based on just this article alone, you’d get the impression that $770 is the total compensation.

      It would have been nice for the author of the article to outline other sources of compensation for victims, and how some Republican senators and members of congress are holding this disaster relief hostage for political reasons.